Equations were developed to describe the experimental rates of formation of ethylene oxide hydrate from stirred, incongruent solutions. Heat conduction through the walls of the dilatometer bulb was rate-controlling. Results for congruent solutions were consistent with these equations during the early stages of hydrate growth.Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 46, 3867 (1968)
General observationsIn Part I the kinetics of hydrate formation from congruent solutions were described. Experiments on incongruent solutions using the magnetically stirred dilatometer were conducted (a) in the water-rich region on solutions containing 5.62 mole % ethylene oxide (EO) which forms a hydrate of formula E0.7.05 H 2 0 at freezing point TfO = 8.02 "C, and (b) in EO-rich solutions containing 34.03 mole % EO which forms a hydrate of formula identical to that in congruent solutions, E0.6.89 H 2 0 , at freezing point TfO = 8.04 "C (1, 2). The tabulated results are given in Part I112.The behavior of EO hydrate formation from stirred incongruent solutions was entirely different from that in congruent solutions. The crystals appeared as small spheres (3), up to about 1 mm in diameter, and did not stick to the glass walls, so that all experiments on incongruent solutions were made in the magnetically stirred dilatometer. Hydrate formation decreased steadily with time and eventually ceased altogether as shown by the results in Fig. 1 for the water-rich region (a). Correspondingly, the solution temperature rose rapidly to a sharp maximum, then decreased back to the thermostat temperature. WMA stands for water-rich, magnetically stirred solution, EMA stands for EO-rich, magnetically stirred solution, and SUM stands for summary of results.At constant thermostat temperature, the rates of hydrate formation are practically identical at stirring rates of 100 r.p.m. or greater, as shown in Fig. 1 by the identical hydrate formation rate curves for run WMA42 at 100 r.p.m. and WMA5 at 320 r.p.m.
Dependence of hydrate formation rate onResults in water-rich solutions revealed that, after the maximum temperature increase, there was a direct proportionality between the rate of hydrate formation and the difference of the solution and thermostat temperatures, (To,, -T,): the data are plotted accordingly in Fig. 3 This dependence is consistent with the rate of hydrate formation depending on the rate of heat conduction through the glass walls of the dilatometer bulb. Accordingly, we derive an expression for this process and compare our experimental results with this expression. Assume the simplest possible temperature profile through the wall as follows: For personal use only.