A variety of methods are available to extract chlorophyll from epilithic biofilms using solvents. The relative efficiency of these has not been determined simultaneously and there is no recognized standard procedure. In this paper techniques for sample collection, storage, preparation and extraction are reviewed and compared experimentally.Extraction of chlorophyll was incomplete unless biofilms were fully hydrated. This factor was highly significant for all the solvents tested, with at least three times more pigment being extracted from hydrated samples than from dry ones. Methanol was the most efficient solvent, releasing over 96% of the total chlorophyll during a single extraction; hot ethanol extracted 86%, while acetone extracted less than 50%. Sonicating samples during extraction did not release any additional pigment. Centrifuging to remove suspended material did not alter estimates and was not advantageous. Rugose rock surfaces released more chlorophyll than smooth ones. However, a simple method to quantify surface rugosity at an appropriate scale was not available.Based on these observations, a standard method for chlorophyll extractions from epilithic biofilms using 100% methanol at room temperature (20°C) is proposed. This technique requires considerably less supervision than previously preferred methods and gave a chlorophyll extract which was stable for 15 h.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.