Low mass M- and K-type stars are much more numerous in the solar neighborhood than solar-like G-type stars. Therefore, some of them may appear as interesting candidates for the target star lists of terrestrial exoplanet (i.e., planets with mass, radius, and internal parameters identical to Earth) search programs like Darwin (ESA) or the Terrestrial Planet Finder Coronagraph/Inferometer (NASA). The higher level of stellar activity of low mass M stars, as compared to solar-like G stars, as well as the closer orbital distances of their habitable zones (HZs), means that terrestrial-type exoplanets within HZs of these stars are more influenced by stellar activity than one would expect for a planet in an HZ of a solar-like star. Here we examine the influences of stellar coronal mass ejection (CME) activity on planetary environments and the role CMEs may play in the definition of habitability criterion for the terrestrial type exoplanets near M stars. We pay attention to the fact that exoplanets within HZs that are in close proximity to low mass M stars may become tidally locked, which, in turn, can result in relatively weak intrinsic planetary magnetic moments. Taking into account existing observational data and models that involve the Sun and related hypothetical parameters of extrasolar CMEs (density, velocity, size, and occurrence rate), we show that Earth-like exoplanets within close-in HZs should experience a continuous CME exposure over long periods of time. This fact, together with small magnetic moments of tidally locked exoplanets, may result in little or no magnetospheric protection of planetary atmospheres from a dense flow of CME plasma. Magnetospheric standoff distances of weakly magnetized Earth-like exoplanets at orbital distances
[1] We examine the implications of the widely used, force-free, constant-a flux rope model of interplanetary magnetic clouds for the evolution of these mesoscale (fraction 1 AU) structures in the heliosphere, with special emphasis on the inner ( 1 AU) heliosphere. We employ primarily events observed by the Helios 1 and 2 probes between 0.3 and 1 AU in the ascending and maximum phases of solar cycle 21 and by Wind at 1 AU in a similar phase of solar activity cycle. We supplement these data by observations from other spacecraft (e.g., Voyagers 1 and 2, Pioneers 10 and 11, and others). Our data set consists of 130 events. We explore three different approaches. In the first, we work with ensemble averages, binning the results into radial segments of width 0.1 AU in the range 0.3 r h 1 AU. Doing this, we find that in the inner heliosphere the modeled average central axial field strength, hB 0 i, varies with heliospheric distance r h as hB 0 i [nT] = 18.1 Á r h À1.64 [AU], and the average diameter increases quasilinearly as hDi [AU] = 0.23 r h 1.14 . The orientation of the axis of the underlying magnetic flux tube in our data set is generally found to lie along the east-west direction and in the ecliptic plane at all values of r h , but there is considerable scatter about these average directions. In the second, we monitor the evolution of magnetic clouds in snapshot fashion, using seven spacecraft alignments. The results are in broad agreement with the statistics reported under step 1. In the final approach, we obtain the functional dependence of B 0 and D predicted by an analytic expression for a freely expanding Lundquist flux tube. We find D to vary linearly with r h , broadly similar to that obtained under approach 1. The maximum field strength scales as r h À2 compared to a r h À1.3dependence obtained from statistics. We compare our findings with those of Bothmer and Schwenn (1998), who used a different methodology. The results obtained form a good background to the forthcoming Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) and Sentinels missions and to multispacecraft studies of magnetic clouds.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.