Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) seems to be essential for angiogenesis and for the growth of colorectal cancer; thus its inhibition can arrest tumor growth and decrease metastatic potential. Octreotide has been shown to inhibit growth of colorectal tumors in vitro and in vivo. Part of the antiproliferative activity of octreotide could be related to its antiangiogenic properties. Effects of octreotide on VEGF expression were evaluated in 35 patients with operable colorectal cancer receiving octreotide for 2 weeks before surgery. Tissue VEGF expression and serum VEGF concentrations were determined before and after treatment with octreotide. There was a statistically significant reduction in the tissue VEGF expression both considering the percentage of VEGF positive cells (P = 0.006) and the intensity of VEGF staining (P = 0.003). A similar significant reduction was observed in serum values of VEGF (P = 0.03). The present study indicates that octreotide inhibits expression of VEGF in colorectal cancer patients, and, furthermore, that serum VEGF expression correlates with tissue VEGF, representing a safe method to monitor the activity of antiangiogenic agents.

To assess the possibility of increasing the detection rates of cytological examination in malignant effusions by the selection of specific tumor markers for a given type of tumor, we measured CEA, CA 19.9, CA 15.3, MCA, PSA, and AFP in malignant effusions from 89 patients with the following primary malignancies: colon, stomach, breast, liver, prostate, lung, and kidney. Cytological examination was positive in only 35 of 89 patients (40%), while the tumor markers were positive in 72 of 89 cases (80%). However, apart from small cell lung and kidney cancers, where the lack of a specific tumor marker resulted in no advantage, in the other types of tumors, the specific marker for each tumor identified correctly malignant effusions in 72 of 74 cases (97%). In fact, CEA was positive in 11 of 11 effusions induced by colorectal cancer; CA 19.9 in 28 of 30 gastric cancer effusions, while MCA and CA 15.3 were positive in breast cancer effusions (16/22 and 20/22). Finally, elevated AFP and PSA indicated hepatocellular and prostate cancer, respectively. In conclusion, in cancer patients with elevated effusion levels of specific tumor markers, the effusions could be considered of a malignant nature even without cytologically demonstrable tumor cells.

Diarrhea is one of the dose-limiting toxicities for administration of fluorouracil (5FU) in patients with colorectal cancer and can result in severe morbidity and mortality. No well-defined prognostic factors influencing 5FU-associated diarrhea have been identified, which means its occurrence is unforeseeable. The aim of this study was to check whether any characteristics related to patients or chemotherapy could allow the identification of subsets of patients at higher risk of developing diarrhea while receiving a regimen containing 5FU. A logistic regression analysis was performed with age, sex, site of primary tumor, presence of primary tumor, presence of colostomy, time since surgery, number of courses of chemotherapy, diarrhea in previous courses, season of treatment, and chemotherapeutic regimens used as model parameters to predict occurrence of diarrhea in 258 colorectal cancer patients receiving a 5FU-containing regimen. Presence of primary tumor (P = 0.004), previous episodes of chemotherapy-related diarrhea (P = 0.00005) and summer season (P = 0.014) were found to be significant risk factors for developing diarrhea. The other variables examined, such as age, sex, chemotherapeutic regimen, site of primary tumor, presence of colostomy, and time since surgery, were not significantly correlated to diarrhea. Chemotherapeutic regimen was the only parameter that allowed prediction of the severity of diarrhea: 5FU/6S-leucovorin/interferon caused more severe diarrhea, followed by 5FU/leucovorin weekly. Although the analysis of these clinical features does not seem to allow the definition of a well-defined subset of colorectal cancer patients at higher risk of 5FU-induced diarrhea, it can be recommended that patients with primary tumor, or who have experienced diarrhea in earlier courses of chemotherapy or are receiving treatment in summer should be carefully monitored, especially in the first cycles.

No abstract

Cancer patients with painful osteolytic bone metastases who had failed initial treatment with hormones and/or chemotherapy were each randomized to receive one of three pamidronate doses as outpatients: 45, 60, 90 mg given every 3 weeks for 12 weeks. Seventy patients were enrolled in this study, for a total of 265 infusions. There were 64 patients who completed 12 weeks of therapy. Forty-eight patients took nonsteroidal antinflammatory drugs, while 22 patients received morphine before pamidronate treatment. A reduction in bone pain and mobility scores was observed in all three different dose groups: in 11 of 23 patients (47%) at 45 mg; in 12 of 24 patients (50%) at 60 mg; and in 16 of 23 patients (69%) at 90 mg. However, while for patients receiving pamidronate at 90 mg median changes in pain and mobility were statistically significant at the 6th week, for patients receiving 45 mg they were not significant until the 12th week and for patients receiving 60 mg, until the 9th week. In weeks 0-6, the daily consumption of analgesics was reduced in 3 patients in the 45-mg arm, in 4 patients in the 60-mg arm, and in 7 patients in the 90-mg arm. In weeks 7-12, the daily consumption of analgesics was reduced in 8 patients receiving 45 mg, in 8 patients receiving 60 mg, and in 7 patients receiving 90 mg. No significant toxicity was recorded. In 2 patients (45 and 90 mg) fever (> 38 degrees C) and myalgia were observed after the first administration. In conclusion, our results seem to confirm the utility of higher doses of pamidronate in patients with painful bone metastases, because of the faster symptom relief achieved.