Objectives The primary objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that administration of dexamethasone 20 mg is superior to a 6 mg dose in adult patients with moderate or severe ARDS due to confirmed COVID-19. The secondary objective is to investigate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone 20 mg versus dexamethasone 6 mg. The exploratory objective of this study is to assess long-term consequences on mortality and quality of life at 180 and 360 days. Trial design REMED is a prospective, phase II, open-label, randomised controlled trial testing superiority of dexamethasone 20 mg vs 6 mg. The trial aims to be pragmatic, i.e. designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention in conditions that are close to real-life routine clinical practice. Participants The study is multi-centre and will be conducted in the intensive care units (ICUs) of ten university hospitals in the Czech Republic. Inclusion criteria Subjects will be eligible for the trial if they meet all of the following criteria: 1. Adult (≥18 years of age) at time of enrolment; 2. Present COVID-19 (infection confirmed by RT-PCR or antigen testing); 3. Intubation/mechanical ventilation or ongoing high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy; 4. Moderate or severe ARDS according to Berlin criteria:  • Moderate – PaO2/FiO2 100–200 mmHg;  • Severe – PaO2/FiO2 < 100 mmHg; 5. Admission to ICU in the last 24 hours. Exclusion criteria Subjects will not be eligible for the trial if they meet any of the following criteria: 1. Known allergy/hypersensitivity to dexamethasone or excipients of the investigational medicinal product (e.g. parabens, benzyl alcohol); 2. Fulfilled criteria for ARDS for ≥14 days at enrolment; 3. Pregnancy or breastfeeding; 4. Unwillingness to comply with contraception measurements from enrolment until at least 1 week after the last dose of dexamethasone (sexual abstinence is considered an adequate contraception method); 5. End-of-life decision or patient is expected to die within next 24 hours; 6. Decision not to intubate or ceilings of care in place; 7. Immunosuppression and/or immunosuppressive drugs in medical history:  a) Systemic immunosuppressive drugs or chemotherapy in the past 30 days;  b) Systemic corticosteroid use before hospitalization;  c) Any dose of dexamethasone during the present hospital stay for COVID-19 for ≥5 days before enrolment;  d) Systemic corticosteroids during present hospital stay for conditions other than COVID-19 (e.g. septic shock); 8. Current haematological or generalized solid malignancy; 9. Any contraindication for corticosteroid administration, e.g.  • intractable hyperglycaemia;  • active gastrointestinal bleeding;  • adrenal gland disorders;  • presence of superinfection diagnosed with locally established clinical and laboratory criteria without adequate antimicrobial treatment; 10. Cardiac arrest before ICU admission; 11. Participation in another interventional trial in the last 30 days. Intervention and comparator Dexamethasone solution for injection/infusion is the investigational medicinal product as well as the comparator. The trial will assess two doses, 20 mg (investigational) vs 6 mg (comparator). Patients in the intervention group will receive dexamethasone 20 mg intravenously once daily on day 1–5, followed by dexamethasone 10 mg intravenously once daily on day 6–10. Patients in the control group will receive dexamethasone 6 mg day 1–10. All authorized medicinal products containing dexamethasone in the form of solution for i.v. injection/infusion can be used. Main outcomes Primary endpoint: Number of ventilator-free days (VFDs) at 28 days after randomisation, defined as being alive and free from mechanical ventilation. Secondary endpoints a) Mortality from any cause at 60 days after randomisation; b) Dynamics of inflammatory marker (C-Reactive Protein, CRP) change from Day 1 to Day 14; c) WHO Clinical Progression Scale at Day 14; d) Adverse events related to corticosteroids (new infections, new thrombotic complications) until Day 28 or hospital discharge; e) Independence at 90 days after randomisation assessed by Barthel Index. The long-term outcomes of this study are to assess long-term consequences on mortality and quality of life at 180 and 360 days through telephone structured interviews using the Barthel Index. Randomisation Randomisation will be carried out within the electronic case report form (eCRF) by the stratified permuted block randomisation method. Allocation sequences will be prepared by a statistician independent of the study team. Allocation to the treatment arm of an individual patient will not be available to the investigators before completion of the whole randomisation process. The following stratification factors will be applied: • Age <65 and ≥ 65; • Charlson Comorbidity index (CCI) <3 and ≥3; • CRP <150 mg/L and ≥150 mg/L • Trial centre. Patients will be randomised in a 1 : 1 ratio into one of the two treatment arms. Randomisation through the eCRF will be available 24 hours every day. Blinding (masking) This is an open-label trial in which the participants and the study staff will be aware of the allocated intervention. Blinded pre-planned statistical analysis will be performed. Numbers to be randomised (sample size) The sample size is calculated to detect the difference of 3 VFDs at 28 days (primary efficacy endpoint) between the two treatment arms with a two-sided type I error of 0.05 and power of 80%. Based on data from a multi-centre randomised controlled trial in COVID-19 ARDS patients in Brazil and a multi-centre observational study from French and Belgian ICUs regarding moderate to severe ARDS related to COVID-19, investigators assumed a standard deviation of VFD at 28 days as 9. Using these assumptions, a total of 142 patients per treatment arm would be needed. After adjustment for a drop-out rate, 150 per treatment arm (300 patients per study) will be enrolled. Trial Status This is protocol version 1.1, 15.01.2021. The trial is due to start on 2 February 2021 and recruitment is expected to be completed by December 2021. Trial registration The study protocol was registered on EudraCT No.:2020-005887-70, and on December 11, 2020 on ClinicalTrials.gov (Title: Effect of Two Different Doses of Dexamethasone in Patients With ARDS and COVID-19 (REMED)) Identifier: NCT04663555 with a last update posted on February 1, 2021. Full protocol The full protocol (version 1.1) is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest of expediting dissemination of this material, the standard formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.

Pulmonary hypertension in chronic pulmonary disease is due mainly to the impairment of the pulmonary vascular bed. It is still doubtful, however, whether neuro-humoral factors also participate in the genesis of this hypertension. Because of the difficulties of the methods that have to be used in the study of this problem, little is known about the autonomous regulation of the lesser circulation in man. Lately there have been some attempts to extend our knowledge in this field by pharmacological investigations of the lesser circulation.Most of the authors have dealt with pulmonary hypertension in congenital or acquired heart disease. Several substances have been employed as e.g. TEAB (Davies et al., 1954;Scott et al., 1955), hexamethonium (Gilmore et al., 1952;Judson et al., 1954;Wade et al., 1956) Rudolph et al., 1958).The genesis of hypertension in congenital and acquired heart disease, however, differs from that of hypertension in cor pulmonale. Little attention has been paid to pulmonary hypertension in cor pulmonale so that the number of studies concerned with the pharmacology of this problem is small. The only substances to be used in sufficiently large groups of subjects with cor pulmonale have been TEAB (Fowler et al., 1950) and hexamethonium (Malamos et al., 1957; Sancetta, 1955).However, results are difficult to assess since the doses of these substances used lowered systemic blood pressure. An attempt was therefore made to affect pulmonary hypertension in cor pulmonale pharmacologically by employing a substance that would lower pulmonary arterial blood pressure without substantially affecting systemic blood pressure. Since it was found (Widimsky et al., 1959) that priscol fulfils these requirements, the effect of this drug upon patients with cor pulmonale has been investigated in greater detail.Methods. Fifteen patients with pulmonary disease, 11 of these with pulmonary hypertension at rest, within an age range of 21-68 years were investigated by catheterization of the pulmonary circulation. One day before catheterization the following premedication was applied: phenobarbital 0-06 g. natr. bromati 0-6 g., chinidini sulphur 0-2 g., and on the day of catheterization phenobarbital 0 03 g., natrii bromati 0 3 g., and chinidini sulphur 0-1 g. were administered. Catheterization was performed in the usual manner, always in the morning.

Background Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis associated with SGLT2 inhibitors is a rare, relatively new and potentially fatal clinical entity, characterized by metabolic acidosis with normal or only moderately elevated glycemia. The mechanisms are not fully understood but involve increased ketogenesis and complex renal metabolic dysfunction, resulting in both ketoacidosis and hyperchloremic acidosis. We report a rare case of fatal empagliflozin-associated acidosis with profound hyperchloremia and review its pathogenesis. Case presentation A patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with empagliflozin underwent an elective hip replacement surgery. Since day 4 after surgery, he felt generally unwell, leading to cardiac arrest on the day 5. Empagliflozin-associated euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis with severe hyperchloremic acidosis was identified as the cause of the cardiac arrest. Conclusions This unique case documents the possibility of severe SGLT2 inhibitor-associated mixed metabolic acidosis with a predominant hyperchloremic component. Awareness of this possibility and a high index of suspicion are crucial for correct and early diagnosis.