Various treatment options are available for treating type III supracondylar fractures of the humerus. The most common technique employed is closed manipulative reduction with K wire fixation. This study was performed to compare two different pinning techniques in type III supracondylar fractures of the humerus. This study was done in the time frame between January 2012 to December 2015. The age of the children selected for this study ranged from 3 to 12 years of age. Among 66 children, 6 were lost to follow up and the final number was 60 children. Patients with lateral pin fixation were allotted to group A(n=29), while patients with cross pin fixation technique were allotted to Group B(n=31). All patients were assessed for loss of fracture reduction and the occurrence of ulnar nerve injury. The two groups were evaluated at regular intervals from the first week to a time frame of 6 months. In both groups of patients, there was no loss of fracture reduction observed. The various parameters pertaining to the study were evaluated and there was no statistical significant difference found between the 2 groups. In group B, 3 of the children had injury to the ulnar nerve. Both groups were comparable in terms of fracture healing duration, loss in the reduction of the fracture and the stability provided by the pin constructs. In conclusion, both fixation constructs are comparable in terms of stability, but there are higher chances of iatrogenic injury to the ulnar nerve by using the crossed pinning technique. Hence, we conclude that the lateral pin construct is safer as compared to the cross pin method.
Background: Intertrochanteric fractures of the femur are fairly common injuries seen in Orthopaedic practice and have a bimodal age distribution. Various modalities of treatment are available in the management of these fractures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of the proximal femoral nail (PFN) in the management of these fractures and to assess the functional outcome using the Harris hip score. Methods: 30 patients with Intertrochanteric fractures of the femur who were willing for surgery and follow up were included in our study and were treated with proximal femoral nail and were followed up for a 3 year period. Results: There was a male preponderance seen in our study with the right hip being more commonly affected. The most common mode of injury was slip and fall followed by road traffic accidents. The mean surgical time was 59.03 minutes and the average time to fracture union was 12.4 weeks. The mean Harris hip score was 83.3 and we had excellent results in 5 patients and good results in 12 of them. Conclusion: Proximal femoral nailing is an effective treatment option in the management of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur and is associated with lesser operating times, minimal blood loss and earlier weight bearing as compared to other fixation methods and rehabilitation of the patients is quite rapid as well leading to a good functional outcome.
<p class="abstract"><span lang="EN-IN">Radial nerve neurotmesis constitutes a major problem in the treatment of closed fractures of the mid-shaft of the humerus. A case of radial nerve </span><span lang="EN-IN">neurotmesis associated with a closed fracture of mid-shaft of the humerus is reported. Radial nerve neurotmesis was found at the fractured site. Early exploration of the nerve and primary internal fixation of the fracture was done which gave a satisfactory result.</span></p>
<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-GB">Fractures of the proximal humerus are complex injuries associated with significant morbidity. Various options are available for management including non-operative treatment, depending upon the pattern of the fracture, quality of the bone and the surgeon's familiarity with the techniques. The age of the patient, physical activity and the medical fitness also largely influence the treatment options. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome following surgical management of these fractures and to compare the results with studies as available in literature</span><span lang="EN-IN">.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> <span lang="EN-GB">30 patients with fractures of the proximal humerus managed by surgical means were studied from January 2012 to January 2014 and were followed up for a minimum period of two years</span>.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-GB">All the fractures treated united clinically by 8 weeks and radiologically by 16 weeks. There were no cases of delayed or non-union in our series. The fractures were more common in men with a gender distribution of 1.3:1 and were also more common in the age group of 50 to 65 years (53%). As per the Neer’s scoring system, 60% patients had excellent results while 33% patients had satisfactory results. They were all pain free and successfully returned to their pre-injury work. 6% patients had an unsatisfactory result</span><span lang="EN-IN">. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-GB">Surgical management of proximal humerus fractures following the principles of articular surface reconstruction, restoration of the anatomy, stable fixation, with minimal injury to the soft tissues and early mobilization, gives good functional results</span><span lang="EN-IN">.</span></p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.