In the Gulf Costal Plain adapted summer annual forages such as pearl millet [Pennisetum typhoides (Burm.) Stapf and C. E. Hubb] are generally higher in energy content than perennial grasses and are capable of producing higher rates of gain. However, practically no data are available which define animal performance at different levels of forage utilization. The lack of definitive data on which to base a grazing program with pearl millet prompted this study which determined liveweight gains of weanling cattle grazing ]pearl millet and evaluated the relationships between gain, forage yield, forage quality, grazing pressure, and profitability.
A hybrid pearl millet ‘Millex 23’ was seeded at the rate of 15 kg/ha on Thenas (Fluvaquentic Eutrochrept; coarse, loamy, mixed, thermic) soil and fertilized with 112 kg/ha each of N, P2O5, and K2O in each of 2 years. Weanling crossbred beef calves were used as tester animals and grazed at stocking rates ranging from 3.73 to 11.35 animals/ha. Liveweight average daily gains (ADG) from 0.27 to 1.01 kg were shown to be a non‐linear function of forage availability and a positive linear function of percent in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD) available forage. Percent IVDMD of available forage varied from 36.29 to 63.57% and was inversely related to length of trial. Neutral detergent fiber values for available forage were negatively correlated with ADG (r= −0.84).
Maximum profitability, expressed as return per ha, was found at intermediate grazing pressure and was dependent upon the magnitude of positive or negative margin between the time of purchase and the time of selling. Maximum profit occurred at greater grazing pressures as the positive margin between selling and purchase price increased.
The most important factor affecting the profitability of grazing pearl millet was the differential between buying and selling price of the cattle. Aside from this factor, which the farmer seldom controls, grazing pressure is the most important determinant of profit. It was concluded that the greatest profit or least loss occurs at medium grazing pressures which, in this study, was approximately 2 kg of available forage per kg of animal liveweight.
Twenty prepuberal Charolais X Brahman-Hereford heifers were randomly assigned to be fed a concentrate containing either 0 mg (C) or 200 mg (M) monensin sodium/head/day. Coastal bermudagrass hay was fed ad libitum. Average daily gain was similar for the two groups. Each heifer received 1 mg of porcine follicle stimulating hormone (FSH-P) (Armour) at 0800 and 2000 hr on days 22 through 26 (10 mg total) and 2,500 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) on day 27. Flank laparotomy was performed on day 30, for examination of ovaries, and ovariectomy was performed on day 37. The average ovarian size +/- standard error at day 15 ws 3,730 +/- 66 mm3 and 1,848 +/- 55 mm3 for groups M and C, respectively (P < .025), as measured by rectal palpation. Numbers of ovulation sites measured on day 30 were 9.1 +/- 2.2 and 4.9 +/- 1.8 per heifer for groups M and C, respectively (P < .01). After ovariectomy on day 37, heifers fed M were found to have greater ovarian weight (P < .05), more corpora lutea (CL) (P < .05), greater total luteal weight (P < .05), more follicles (P < .01) and greater weight of follicular fluid (P < .05) and stroma (P < .025) than controls. CL were analyzed for progesterone content by spectrophotometric procedures. Heifers fed M had slightly larger CL (P < .10) with progesterone concentrations similar to those in CL from controls. This resulted in more luteal progesterone per CL and more luteal progesterone per heifer in the M heifers than in the controls. Prepuberal heifers fed M, which caused the expected shifts in rumen fermentation and volatile fatty acid production, exhibited an enhanced ovarian response to gonadotropins compared to that exhibited by controls.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.