Many breeding programs have been implemented in developing countries, many of which have been unsuccessful. To better understand the failure of these breeding programs, it is proposed to analyze their adequacy with innovations that are actually adopted by smallholders. The proposed methodology takes account of these innovations, the reasons for their adoption and the objectives of livestock keeping. The N'Dama cattle-breeding program in Senegal was used as a case study. Surveys were carried out among 54 farmers: 27 breeders who participated in this program, 17 of whom recently resigned, and 27 breeders who have never participated. Feeding was the most frequently cited area of innovation, followed by infrastructure. Genetics, animal health and reproduction held the third rank. Milk production appeared as an important objective of breeders, although the context remains one of strong multifunctionality. Principal component analysis highlighted three categories of breeders according to the innovations they adopted: institutional, modernizing, and integrating innovators. The groups of institutional and modernizing innovators dominate, gathering each 41% of the farmers. In the first category, breeders have organized themselves in an association and use N'Dama sires, livestock aiming at an insurance objective. In the second category, artificial insemination with exotic breeds and other technical innovations (cowshed, vaccination, urea treatment of straw) are used to improve production of milk and meat. The third group is termed 'integrating innovators,' since their innovations aim at integrating livestock and crop production. Gathering 18% of the sampled breeders, this group presents intermediate features between the two previous groups, using animals as draught power and for manure production. These results indicate that a process of intensification is at play and that the genetic improvement through the selection of N'Dama cattle for production criteria does not meet the breeders' demand. However, the N'Dama's adaptive traits justify its use as part of the breeding strategy of farmers, either in pure-breeding or in crossbreeding. The study thus tends to show the interactive link between genetic improvement and other innovations. It suggests that the success of a breeding program depends on its adequate positioning within the set of innovations adopted by breeders and proposes a method to inform breeding programs accordingly.

No abstract

La sélection génétique est un moyen pour augmenter la productivité des races endémiques dans des environnements hostiles. La trypanotolérance du bovin N’Dama a été l’argument central de la mise en œuvre des programmes de sélection de cette race en Gambie, au Mali et au Sénégal. Ces programmes ont eu des trajectoires différentes selon les objectifs, le processus de conception et les stratégies développées. L’analyse de ces trajectoires aiderait à mieux comprendre leurs succès et leurs échecs. Pour ce faire, une étude comparative de ces programmes a été réalisée en se basant sur une littérature scientifique publiée et non publiée et des entretiens avec les acteurs. L’analyse a d’abord consisté à décrire chaque programme. Une discussion a ensuite été menée pour évaluer les facteurs de succès et d’échec. Cette analyse a montré que ces facteurs dépendent de l’intérêt des éleveurs en lien avec leurs objectifs de production et leurs pratiques, de la stratégie utilisée tenant compte de l’intégration ou non de la trypanotolérance dans les critères de sélection, et de la mobilisation des ressources financières et humaines. Ces programmes de sélection ont aussi généré un capital d’expériences, dont la valorisation permettrait d’améliorer les systèmes actuels et de bâtir des programmes durables de sélection pour les systèmes d’élevage à faibles niveaux d’intrants dans les pays en développement.

Many cattle breeding programs were initiated in Africa to increase the productivity of indigenous cattle breeds. Most of these programs have failed, partly due to the lack of involvement of breeders. The present case study contributes to the understanding of such failures. The N'Dama cattle breeding program in Senegal was taken as a case study for an in-depth analysis of participation using mixed methods. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 52 breeders: 26 who participated, 15 of whom recently resigned, and 27 who had never participated. Content and statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate the motivations of breeders and the factors influencing their participation in the breeding program. Results more particularly highlight the complexity of social issues within a breeding project, in face of classical determinants of adoption that are distance or production systems features. It pinpoints crucial levers of improvement, i.e., the management of animal property rights between the nucleus management and the participating breeders, the legitimacy of participants' representatives in cooperatives, and the strategic mobilization of member social networks. Also, adding on previous works of the authors, this study highlights the need to take better account of the dynamics of production systems, then paying sufficient attention to the objectives, preferences, and ongoing strategies of the breeders for the future. The present study is the first to highlight the added value of mixed methods to analyze innovation adoption and participation in a livestock breeding program, taking both into account the overall innovation drivers and dynamics tied to actors' strategies. Keywords N'Dama cattle. Genetic improvement. Breeders' motivations. Mixed methods. Senegal Contents 1 Introduction 2 Material and methods 2.1 Study area 2.2 Sampling and data collection 2.3 Data analysis 2.3.1 Content analysis of narratives 2.3.2 Statistical analysis of questionnaire data 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Congruence with breeders' objectives, main motive for participation 3.2 The ambiguous role of social bonds 3.3 Institutional roots of trust and program's outreach 3.4 Competition, conflicts, and power relationships 3.5 Methodological insights 3.6 Highlight: a matter of trust 4 Conclusion Acknowledgments References

No abstract