Objective To assess the feasibility of performing dose measurements in the target (prostate) and an adjacent organ at risk (rectum) using polymer dosimetry gel and thermoluminescence detectors (TLDs) in an anthropomorphic, deformable, and multimodal pelvis phantom (ADAM PETer). Methods The 3D printed prostate organ surrogate of the ADAM PETer phantom was filled with polymer dosimetry gel. Nine TLD600 (LiF:Mg,Ti) were installed in 3 × 3 rows on a specifically designed 3D‐printed TLD holder. The TLD holder was inserted into the rectum at the level of the prostate and fixed by a partially inflated endorectal balloon. Computed tomography (CT) images were taken and treatment planning was performed. A prescribed dose of 4.5 Gy was delivered to the planning target volume (PTV). The doses measured by the dosimetry gel in the prostate and the TLDs in the rectum (“measured dose”) were compared to the doses calculated by the treatment planning system (“planned dose”) on a voxel‐by‐voxel basis. Results In the prostate organ surrogate, the 3D‐γ‐index was 97.7% for the 3% dose difference and 3 mm distance to agreement criterium. In the center of the prostate organ surrogate, measured and planned doses showed only minor deviations (<0.1 Gy, corresponding to a percentage error of 2.22%). On the edges of the prostate, slight differences between planned and measured doses were detected with a maximum deviation of 0.24 Gy, corresponding to 5.3% of the prescribed dose. The difference between planned and measured doses in the TLDs was on average 0.08 Gy (range: 0.02–0.21 Gy), corresponding to 1.78% of the prescribed dose (range: 0.44%–4.67%). Conclusions The present study demonstrates the feasibility of using polymer dosimetry gel and TLDs for 3D and 1D dose measurements in the prostate and the rectum organ surrogates in an anthropomorphic, deformable and multimodal phantom. The described methodology might offer new perspectives for end‐to‐end tests in image‐guided adaptive radiotherapy workflows.
Background Magnetic resonance‐guided proton therapy is promising, as it combines high‐contrast imaging of soft tissue with highly conformal dose delivery. However, proton dosimetry in magnetic fields using ionization chambers is challenging since the dose distribution as well as the detector response are perturbed. Purpose This work investigates the effect of the magnetic field on the ionization chamber response, and on the polarity and ion recombination correction factors, which are essential for the implementation of a proton beam dosimetry protocol in the presence of magnetic fields. Methods Three Farmer‐type cylindrical ionization chambers, the 30013 with 3 mm inner radius (PTW, Freiburg, Germany) and two custom built chambers “R1” and “R6” with 1 and 6 mm inner radii respectively were placed at the center of an experimental electromagnet (Schwarzbeck Mess – Elektronik, Germany) 2 cm depth of an in‐house developed 3D printed water phantom. The detector response was measured for a 3 × 10 cm2 field of mono‐energetic protons 221.05 MeV/u for the three chambers, and with an additional proton beam of 157.43 MeV/u for the chamber PTW 30013. The magnetic flux density was varied between 0.1 and 1.0 Tesla in steps of 0.1 Tesla. Results At both energies, the ionization chamber PTW 30013 showed a non‐linear response as a function of the magnetic field strength, with a decrease of the ionization chamber response of up to 0.27% ± 0.06% (1 SD) at 0.2 Tesla, followed by a smaller effect at higher magnetic field strength. For the chamber R1, the response decreased slightly with the magnetic field strength up to 0.45% ± 0.12% at 1 Tesla, and for the chamber R6, the response decreased up to 0.54% ± 0.13% at 0.1 Tesla, followed by a plateau up to 0.3 Tesla, and a weaker effect at higher magnetic field strength. The dependence of the polarity and recombination correction factor on the magnetic field was ⩽0.1% for the chamber PTW 30013. Conclusions The magnetic field has a small but significant effect on the chamber response in the low magnetic field region for the chamber PTW 30013 and for R6, and in the high magnetic field region for the chamber R1. Corrections may be necessary for ionization chamber measurements, depending on both the chamber volume and the magnetic flux density. No significant effect of the magnetic field on the polarity and recombination correction factor was detected in this work for the ionization chamber PTW 30013.
The implementation of new image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) treatment techniques requires the development of new quality assurance (QA) methods including geometric and dosimetric validation of the applied dose in 3D. Polymer gels (PG) provide a promising tool to perform such tests. However, to be used in a large variety of clinical applications, the PG must be flexibly applicable. In this work, we present a variety of phantoms used in clinical routine to perform both hardware and workflow tests in IGRT. This includes the validation of isocenter accuracy in magnetic resonance (MR)-guided RT (MRgRT) and end-to-end tests of online adaptive treatment techniques for inter- and intra-fraction motion management in IGRT. The phantoms are equipped with one or more PG containers of different materials including 3D printed containers to allow for 3D dosimetry in arbitrarily shaped structures. The proposed measurement techniques and phantoms provide a flexible application and show a clear benefit of PG for 3D dosimetry in combination with end-to-end tests in many clinical QA applications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.