This study is aimed to compare outcomes of penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty to inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra as a singlecentre experience. Data regarding vaginoplasty performed between May 2003 and January 2014 were reviewed. Subjects were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique performed: perineal- scrotal flap vaginoplasty (Group A), and inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra vaginoplasty (Group B). All patients underwent to psychological analysis before surgery. Functional follow-up was based on a modified validated Female Sexual Function Index. Overall, 67 patients with a mean (SD) age of 34 (±9.38) years underwent to surgery. 41 patients were included into the Group A and 26 into the Group B. Mean operative time among Groups A and B was 316 (±101.65) and 594 (±89.06) minutes, respectively (p<0.0001). Longer postoperative hospitalization was shown in Group B (14 days ± 4,51) than in Group A (10 days ± 2,49); (p<0.0001). Group B patients showed a higher anemization rate requiring blood transfusion (p=0.00014) as well as compressive neuropathy (p=0.038). In addition to this, necrosis of the skin flap was reported in 8 patients of Group B (p<0.0001). Comprehensive functional follow-up data was included; spontaneous vaginal lubrication was not reported in 82.4% of Group A vs 12.5% cases of Group B (p=0.0085). When compared to penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty, inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra technique shows an increased risk of complications with comparable satisfaction rates whereas a higher spontaneous vaginal lubrication is reported. Sexological support is of utmost importance in this setting.
Background
Plaque incision and grafting (PEG) is one of the mainstays in surgical therapy for severe penile curvature in Peyronie’s disease (PD). Different kinds of grafts are available for covering albugineal defects during PEG, both allografts and xenografts. However, to date, none of these proved superior to others.
Objectives
To compare two different types of xenograft, porcine dermal matrix and bovine pericardium matrix in PEG for PD.
Materials and methods
From 2010 to 2019, 63 patients with PD underwent PEG, using porcine dermal (n = 25; Group 1) and bovine pericardium (n = 38; Group 2) grafts. Long‐term outcomes were evaluated through multi‐disciplinary questionnaires administration by phone interview. The following items were considered: correction of penile bending, quality of erection, intercourse ability, penile shortening, and sensitiveness. Overall satisfaction and impact of surgery on sexual activity and quality of life were also investigated.
Results
Plaque median (IQR) size was 29 (22‐33) mm and was smaller in Group 1 (27.5 vs. 31 mm; P = .03). Complete follow‐up data were available for 53 patients (84%). Considering post‐operative outcomes, no differences were found when considering ED rates, penile shortening, sensitiveness, complications, and penile straightening (all P > .1). Patients in Group 2 were more likely to have palpable penile nodules at follow‐up (20.6 vs. 0%; P = .03). However, patient’s post‐operative sexual life satisfaction was consistent between the two groups, with just 1 (5.3) and 8 (23.5) patients in Group 1 and 2 respectively referring a worsening in sexual life satisfaction (P = 0.2). At follow‐up, 84.9% of patients that would still undergo surgery for PD, with no statistical difference between the two groups (P = .4).
Conclusions
Corporoplasty with PEG is an effective treatment for men with PD. Porcine dermal and bovine pericardium xenografts seem to have similar long‐term outcomes.
Conclusion: Prevention of VTE in our institution is feasible. Cemical thromboprophylaxis did not increase the risk of hemorrhage and can be safely used even after highlevel hepato-biliary pancreatic surgeries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.