Aims Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a minimally invasive alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement. Hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening (HALT)—a marker of subclinical leaflet thrombosis commonly detected by cardiac computed tomography (CT) after TAVI—may influence valve durability and function. The purpose of this study was to compare commissural alignment of the native and prosthetic aortic valves in cardiac CT in subjects with and without HALT and thereby identify commissural misalignment as potential predictor for leaflet thrombosis after TAVI. Methods and results In 170 subjects, 85 with and 85 without HALT in post-TAVI CT, commissural orientation of the prosthesis was determined comparing native and prosthetic aortic valve orientation in cardiac CT by measuring the commissural angle relative to the right coronary ostium in the aortic valve plane. For the prosthetic valve, any deviation ≤ 15° compared to the native valve was classified as “aligned”; 16–30° as “mild”, 31–45° as “moderate” and ≥ 45° as “severe” misalignment. Among subjects with HALT, median angular deviation was higher (36°, IQR 31°) than in the control group (29°, IQR 29°, p = 0.042). “Severe” misalignment was more frequent in subjects who developed HALT (n = 31, 37%) compared to the control group (n = 17, 20%, p = 0.013). In logistic regression analysis, more severe deviation (p = 0.015, OR = 1.02 per 1° deviation) and “severe” misalignment (p = 0.018, OR = 2.2) represented independent predictors for the occurrence of HALT after TAVI. Conclusion Subclinical leaflet thrombosis after TAVI is associated with commissural misalignment. Potential clinical advantages of obtaining commissural alignment remain to be systematically assessed. Graphical abstract Association of HALT with commissural misalignment after TAVI. HALT hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening, IQR interquartile range, TAVI transfemoral aortic valve replacement
Background: Increased pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) attenuation derived from coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) relates to coronary inflammation and cardiac mortality. We aimed to investigate the association between CT-derived characterization of different cardiac fat compartments and myocardial ischemia as assessed by computed fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ).Methods: In all, 133 patients (median 64 y, 74% male) with coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent CTA including FFR CT measurement followed by invasive FFR assessment (FFR INVA-SIVE ). CT attenuation and volume of PCAT were quantified around the proximal right coronary artery (RCA), left anterior descending artery (LAD), and left circumflex artery (LCX). Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and paracardial adipose tissue (PAT; all intrathoracic adipose tissue outside the pericardium) were quantified in noncontrast cardiac CT datasets.Results: Median FFR CT was 0.86 [0.79, 0.91] and median FFR INVASIVE was 0.87 [0.81, 0.93]. Subjects with the presence of myocardial ischemia (n = 26) defined by an FFR CT -threshold of ≤ 0.75 showed significantly higher RCA PCAT attenuation than individuals without myocardial ischemia (n = 107) (−75.1 ± 10.8 vs. −81.1 ± 10.6 HU, P = 0.011). In multivariable analysis adjusted for age, body mass index, sex and risk factors, increased RCA PCAT attenuation remained a significant predictor of myocardial ischemia. Between individuals with myocardial ischemia compared with individuals without myocardial ischemia, there was no significant difference in the volume and CT attenuation of EAT and PAT or in the PCAT volume of RCA, LAD, and LCX.Conclusions: Increased RCA PCAT attenuation is associated with the presence of myocardial ischemia as assessed by FFR, while PCAT volume, EAT, and PAT are not.
Objectives We evaluated the influence of image reconstruction kernels on the diagnostic accuracy of CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) compared to invasive FFR in patients with coronary artery disease. Methods Sixty-nine patients, in whom coronary CT angiography was performed and who were further referred for invasive coronary angiography with FFR measurement via pressure wire, were retrospectively included. CT data sets were acquired using a third-generation dual-source CT system and rendered with medium smooth (Bv40) and sharp (Bv49) reconstruction kernels. FFRCT was calculated on-site using prototype software. Coronary stenoses with invasive FFR ≤ 0.80 were classified as significant. Agreement between FFRCT and invasive FFR was determined for both reconstruction kernels. Results One hundred analyzed vessels in 69 patients were included. Twenty-five vessels were significantly stenosed according to invasive FFR. Using a sharp reconstruction kernel for FFRCT resulted in a significantly higher correlation with invasive FFR (r = 0.74, p < 0.01 vs. r = 0.58, p < 0.01; p = 0.04) and a higher AUC in ROC curve analysis to correctly identify/exclude significant stenosis (AUC = 0.92 vs. AUC = 0.82 for sharp vs. medium smooth kernel, respectively, p = 0.02). A FFRCT value of ≤ 0.8 using a sharp reconstruction kernel showed a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 92% for detecting ischemia-causing lesions, resulting in a diagnostic accuracy of 91%. The medium smooth reconstruction kernel performed worse (sensitivity 60%, specificity 89%, accuracy 82%). Conclusion Compared to invasively measured FFR, FFRCT using a sharp image reconstruction kernel shows higher diagnostic accuracy for detecting lesions causing ischemia, potentially altering decision-making in a clinical setting. Key Points • Image reconstruction parameters influence the diagnostic accuracy of simulated fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography. • Using a sharp kernel image reconstruction algorithm delivers higher diagnostic accuracy compared to medium smooth kernel image reconstruction (gold standard invasive fractional flow reserve).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.