The JSQ appears to be a potentially useful measure of hearing aid outcome, especially when using group data to document the benefits of amplification. Additional efforts should be directed at improving the reliability of the JSQ, however, before application to hearing aid wearers on an individual basis.

Increasing the rate of presentation can have a deleterious effect on auditory processing, especially among the elderly. Rate can be manipulated by changing the duration of individual components of a sequence of sounds, by changing the inter-stimulus interval (ISI) between components, or both. Consequently, when age-related deficits in performance appear to be attributable to rate of stimulus presentation, it is often the case that alternative explanations in terms of the effects of stimulus duration or ISI are also possible. In this study, the independent effects of duration and ISI on the discrimination of temporal order for four-tone sequences were investigated in a group of young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners. It was found that discrimination performance was driven by the rate of presentation, rather than stimulus duration or ISI alone, for both groups of listeners. The performance of the two groups of listeners differed significantly for the fastest presentation rates, but was similar for the slower rates. Slowing the rate of presentation seemed to improve performance, regardless of whether this was done by increasing stimulus duration or increasing ISI, and this was observed for both groups of listeners. [Work supported, in part, by NIA.]