No abstract

Results and Discussion: Content and layout were standardised. A Minimal Acceptable Content (MAC) was agreed taking into account DAS(1) and ASA(2) recommendations. Local preferences were also given consideration(3). To make identification of the Rescue Trolley easier, unique blue coloured trolleys were purchased. Equipment was allocated to each of the 5 drawers in a logical manner. For example, items likely to be used at the same time were stored together. External labelling was used to identify drawer contents. Within each drawer, individual items were labelled or highlighted to make identification quicker and easier. Fluorescent yellow or black marker pen was used to highlight sizes, particularly where this information was difficult to find. The importance of not obscuring manufacturer's printed information is emphasised. Laryngoscope handles were labelled to identify blade types. Following this process, the effects were audited for ease of use and user satisfaction and minor adjustments made. An inventory of existing equipment was compiled, missing equipment purchased and inappropriate equipment discarded. Procedures to check content were revised to include use of photographs and checklists. Conclusion(s): Standardising rescue airway trolley content within and across hospitals in Glasgow is described. This may improve ease of use and reduce system vulnerabilities in airway management.