The aim of this study was to assess blood salvage during Caesarean section. In 15 Caesarean sections, red cells lost were collected and washed with a Dideco machine and tested for the presence of fetoplacental material, bacterial contamination, free haemoglobin and fetal blood cells. Successive patients were allocated randomly to one of two groups. In group 1 (n = 34), intraoperative blood was salvaged, while group 2 served as a control. The mean amount of blood salvaged in group 1 was 363 (SD 153) ml. Blood was salvaged following these guidelines: identification of blood group of the mother and fetus; avoidance of aspirating blood from the umbilical cord; commencement of salvage after removing the fetoplacental unit; completely filling the centrifugation bowl with red cells; washing the cells using at least 1000 ml of physiological solution per bowl; and mixing the contents of the bowl, completely eliminating the buffy coat where fetal cells are located. In group 1, the use of homologous blood transfusions was significantly lower (one of 34 (2.9%) patients compared with eight of 34 (23.5%); P = 0.01), haemoglobin concentrations during the first 4 days after operation were significantly higher and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter. Duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter in group 1 (5.3 (1.9) vs 7.3 (4) days; P = 0.003). Mean base haemoglobin concentrations were significantly lower in group 1 (10.7 (1.4) vs 11.7 (1.5) g dl-1; P > 0.0001), while after surgery mean haemoglobin concentrations were significantly higher approximately 3 h after operation compared with the control group (10.2 (1.5) vs 8.6 (1.2) g dl-1; P < 0.0001). On the first day, haemoglobin concentrations were 9.8 (1.5) vs 8 (1.4) g dl-1 (P < 0.0001), on the second day 9.8 (1.4) vs 7.7 (1.4) g dl-1 (P < 0.0001), on the third day 10.1 (1.5) vs 7.5 (1.3) g dl-1 (P < 0.0001) and on the fourth day 10.4 (1.5) vs 8.1 (1.4) g dl-1 (P < 0.0001).
Background: Second trimester emergency cerclage is an option for pregnant women presenting bulging fetal membranes. Despite a significant prolongation of pregnancy might be achieved, serious fetal and maternal events have been reported. Exclusion of infections through preprocedure amniocentesis has been proposed. Methods: A 37-year-old woman, gravida 4 para 1, was admitted at 21 weeks of gestation to our University Hospital due to bulging fetal membranes. An amniocentesis was performed in order to exclude an actual amniotic infection. Our Microbiology Department found a negative amniotic culture for bacteria and Mycoplasma and a normal glucose and interleukin-6 level, so a cervical cerclage was performed. The patient was discharged home on oral erythromycin. Results: After 48 h, the patient complained of hyperpyrexia, shivers and reduced fetal movements. Ultrasound at admission showed absent cardiac activity and after cerclage removal a non-viable fetus was delivered vaginally. Piperacillin and tazobactam were started, but the clinical course of the patient deteriorated and she developed a cold septic shock and was submitted to hysterectomy and transferred to the ICU of our hospital. Conclusion: This report heralds that even after negative amniocentesis, a life-threatening infection may not be excluded in women candidate for emergency cerclage due to bulging fetal membranes.
The aim of our study was to assess the sonographic indices of fetal head progression obtained by three-dimensional ultrasound during the second stage of labor in women with and without mobile epidural analgesia. Sonographic volume data sets were obtained with a transperineal approach every 20 min from the beginning of the active second stage until delivery. The ultrasound parameters were calculated off-line from each volume and compared between women with and without epidural analgesia. All the sonographic measurements of the fetal head descent were comparable at each time interval between the two groups. This observation suggests that mobile epidural analgesia is not likely to affect the dynamics of the second stage of labor.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.