The same dose of intravenous oxycodone and morphine administered by PCA pump was needed for immediate postoperative analgesia. The two drugs appear to be equipotent.

We evaluated the effect of 25 microg of fentanyl added to bupivacaine on sensory and motor block. By using a double-blinded study design, 80 men undergoing urologic surgery were randomized into the following four groups: Group I, bupivacaine 10 mg; Group II, bupivacaine 10 mg + fentanyl 25 microg; Group III, bupivacaine 7.5 mg + fentanyl 25 microg; Group IV, bupivacaine 5 mg + fentanyl 25 microg. The final volume of intrathecal injectate was adjusted to 2. 5 mL with sterile distilled water. Spinal anesthesia was administered with the 27-gauge Whitacre needle at the L2-3 interspace with the patient in the sitting position. Neural block was assessed by using pinprick and a modified Bromage scale. The degree of motor block was more profound in Group II compared with Group I at the end of operation. In Group IV, there was no motor block at the end of operation in any of the patients. The median level of the upper limit of the sensory block was higher than T(7) in all groups before the start of surgery. The addition of 25 microg of fentanyl to 5 mg of bupivacaine resulted in short-acting motor block. When 25 microg of fentanyl was added to 10 mg of bupivacaine, it increased the intensity and duration of motor block. Only 5 (6. 3%) of the patients needed supplemental analgesia during the operation. ¿abs¿

This prospective investigation was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different volumes of epidural blood patch (EBP) for treatment of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) in 81 consecutive patients. In the first part of the investigation (Study part I), 10 ml of blood was injected for EBP in 28 patients. In the second randomized part of the investigation (Study part II), the patients were allocated to receive for EBP either 10 ml (27 patients) or 10-15 ml (26 patients), according to the height of the patient. The procedure was considered initially successful if PDPH disappeared completely during the 2-h recovery room follow-up. To evaluate the long-term success, a questionnaire was mailed to all patients. The EBP performed 3.7 +/- 2.9 days following the dural puncture was initially successful in 88-96% of the patients in the different study groups. In the questionnaire, only 50-68% of the patients reported that PDPH had disappeared immediately without recurrence. In 16-36% of the patients the PDPH returned at lesser intensity and in 14-17% PDPH was reported to have continued, disappearing gradually in all patients. Despite this, 87% of all patients were satisfied with the EBP treatment. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups. The results indicate that a larger, height-adjusted volume of blood for EBP in adults does not produce a better effect on PDPH compared to a standard 10-ml volume. Despite the excellent initial effect (91%) seen in our patients, a permanent effect of the blood patch was only achieved in 61%.

In this closed claims analysis, major problems related to neuraxial blocks were rare. Epidural or a combined spinal and epidural technique resulted in more complications than did spinal procedure.

Interscalene block may cause phrenic nerve block and decreased diaphragmatic motion. We evaluated the effect of continuous interscalene block on ventilatory function and diaphragmatic motion. We studied ten patients scheduled for surgery or manipulation of the shoulder. Preoperatively, the patients underwent spirometry and double-exposure chest radiography. They received an interscalene block with 0.75% bupivacaine. Thereafter, 0.25% bupivacaine was infused into the interscalene space for 24 h. Spirometry was repeated three times and double-exposure radiography twice. The maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures were measured repeatedly. Haemoglobin oxygen saturation (SPO2) was monitored with pulse oximetry. The block provided adequate anaesthesia for surgery or manipulation. All patients had a marked ipsilateral paresis of the diaphragm in the radiographs 3 h after the initial block. Twenty-one hours later five patients had diaphragmatic motility comparable to the situation before the block. In the other five patients, the amplitude of diaphragmatic motility on the side of the block was only 4-37% of the values before the block. All patients had a clear reduction in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) 3 and 8 h after the block without signs of dyspnoea. In conclusion, in all our patients interscalene block caused an ipsilateral hemidiaphragm paresis, which in five of ten patients persisted until the end of the continuous block.