Dynamic arterial and venous pressures (PA, PV) are used as the simplest tools to assess vascular access quality (VAQ). An increased PV over three consecutive dialyses is believed to indicate a stenosis, a rule devised for synthetic grafts (AVG) but not adequately validated for AV fistulas (AVF). In this study dynamic PV and static intra-access pressure (calculated by means of the simplified formula PIA=(PA+PV)/2) changes were evaluated in 46 accesses in which balloon angioplasty had to eventually be performed. The whole group consisted of 30 forearm AVF, 5 upper arm AVF and 11 AVG. Pressures were compared in each patient at a time of satisfactory access flow (QVA) and immediately before the angioplasty and pressure difference over that period (deltaPV, deltaPIA) evaluated. Despite a significant drop in QVA over the follow-up interval in both AVF and AVG, the mean deltaPV and deltaPIA in AVF were only several mm Hg and the chosen threshold limit of 20 mmHg was exceeded in approximately 10% of patients only. The results in the AVG group were, however, very different: The mean deltaPV and deltaPIA were close to 20 mmHg and almost 60% of patients in the AVG group exceeded this limit. Evaluation of PIA did not improve stenosis detection in either group. It is concluded that PV and/or PIA monitoring may be useful to detect a stenosis in AVG but not in AVF.

Access dysfunction presents a risk for haemodialysis patients and is costly for health care providers. Regular vascular access quality (VAQ) monitoring enables the detection of adverse access conditions early allowing timely interventions, which will presumably be less invasive, more successful and cheaper. This paper reviews all currently used assessment parameters: dynamic and static pressures, recirculation and blood flow through the access--and analyses pros and cons of each of them. Based on this overview it is concluded that access flow monitoring should be the method of choice, possibly combined with monitoring of another parameter to further enlarge diagnostic possibilities of the monitoring. The VAQ monitoring system developed and used currently in the author's dialysis centre is briefly described as an example. The issue of access flow related to haemodynamics is briefly mentioned. With the introduction of any VAQ monitoring system, one has to acknowledge a change in structure of interventions and that the demand for surgical procedures decreases with a concurrent increase in percutaneous interventions.