Product reviews are valuable for upcoming buyers in helping them make decisions. To this end, different opinion mining techniques have been proposed, where judging a review sentence�s orientation (e.g. positive or negative) is one of their key challenges. Recently, deep learning has emerged as an effective means for solving sentiment classification problems. Deep learning is a class of machine learning algorithms that learn in supervised and unsupervised manners. A neural network intrinsically learns a useful representation automatically without human efforts. However, the success of deep learning highly relies on the large-scale training data. We propose a novel deep learning framework for product review sentiment classification which employs prevalently available ratings supervision signals. The framework consists of two steps: (1) learning a high-level representation (an embedding space) which captures the general sentiment distribution of sentences through rating information; (2) adding a category layer on top of the embedding layer and use labelled sentences for supervised fine-tuning. We explore two kinds of low-level network structure for modelling review sentences, namely, convolutional function extractors and long temporary memory. Convolutional layer is the core building block of a CNN and it consists of kernels. Applications are image and video recognition, natural language processing, image classification

Aim: Recognizing the Handwritten Digits to find the best accuracy using Machine learning methods such as Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Methods and Materials: Accuracy and loss are performed with the MNIST dataset from the Keras library. The two groups Connectionist Temporal classification (N=20) and Convolutional Neural Network algorithms (N=20). Results: A CNN is used for recognizing the innovative handwritten digits. The accuracy is analysed based on correctness of the exact digits of 92.67% where the CTC has the accuracy of 89.07%. The two algorithms CNN and CTC are statistically satisfied with the independent sample T-Test (=.001) value (p<0.05) with confidence level of 95%. Conclusion: Recognizing the handwritten digits significantly seems to be better in CNN than CTC.