UNIVEASIDCII) WTONOPlCI METROPOLIT~NCS-IZTFIPFILc)PFI
J. Figuercla Nazuno
UNIVERSIDCID IA SfiLLE
Laboratorio d e Sistemas CcrmplejosRp. Postal 70-499, C.P. 64516 Mbxico, D.F. MEXICOPhysicists' irit erest in neural net works stems 1 argel y frctm the analogy between such networks and simple magnetic systems, such as t h e one studied by Sherrington arid Kirkpatrick. C111.Such analogy w a s first pointed out by Little and Shaw C53, and w a 5 developed by Hopfield C 4 3 , who pointed out the equivalence between t h e long-t ime behavior of n e t w u r k s with symmetric connections ar?d equilibrium properties of magnetic systems such a 5 s p i n glasses.Unfcwtunatel ly, this analogy has serious drawbacks. First, the connections in neural systems are not distributed in a random way, but have correlations that are formed both genetically, arid in the course o f learning and adaptation. another major differeurce is the asymmetry o f the c u n r e c t i ons : the pai rw i se i nt ev-act i cms bet ween neurons are, i n g e n e r a l , rrut reciprrrcal ly symmetric; hence, their dynamic prcrperties may be v e r y different f r o m those of equilibrium magnet ic systems. Finally, there i s no obvious genera', izat ion tcr the case of neurons with continuous valued st at 62s. The above arguments and t h e variety of neurocamputat iorral pr-ucedures inspired in physical ideas make evident that no global physical foundation exists for Neurwdynamic=.. The best caracterizak ions made are o f mathematical character, such a5 t h e high number o f degrees o f freedom, non-linearity arsd asyntotic stability; but this formalism h a s not y e t match a physical model as a paradigm f o r future research. Iri this paper w e proposse an stochastic physical model for a certain class o f neurocomputat ional architectures (for another type of foundations, 5ee C23). I n previous papers Cl, 0,9,101 w e proposed that certain formalism specially designed f o r t h e study o f Brownian Motion t6,121 could be applied t o t h e deduction of t h e neurudynamical equations currently used in feedback neural network models. That is, from equations ?such as (1) rt DtFI = iR-c)(t) -dr K(T)-FI(t-T) + Flt) w e r e deducted t h e neurodynamical equations corresponding t o the evolution o f N interacting neurons. They are given, for variuus Hopfield-type networks C4,73, by t h e following set 111 -573