Seed of the hemp cultivar Unika-b was cold-pressed to obtain hemp seed meal (HSM) containing 307 g/kg crude protein and 164 g/kg ether extract (60 g/kg linoleic acid, 120 g/kg alpha-linolenic acid, 160 g/kg oleic acid, lesser amounts of palmitic, stearic, and gamma-linolenic acids). For 4 weeks, 102 43-week-old DeKalb Sigma hens were fed on isonitrogenous and isoenergetic diets containing 0, 50, 100 or 200 g/kg HSM. Eggs were collected for fatty acid analysis during the fourth week of feeding these diets. No significant differences were found between feed treatments for egg production, feed consumption, feed efficiency, body weight change or egg quality. Increasing dietary inclusion of HSM produced eggs with lower concentrations of palmitic acid and higher concentrations of linoleic and alpha-linolenic acids.
The increasing public concern for animal welfare has pushed the poultry sector to progressively replace conventional battery cages (CC) for laying hens with alternative systems such as enriched cages (EC) and aviaries (AV). The aim of this study was to compare laying performance, egg location, and egg quality associated with these three housing types. The experiment was conducted in twelve pilot-scale chambers fitted out with one of the three treatments. Each chamber housed 30 Lohmann LSL-Lite laying hens from 23 to 32 weeks of age. The available area was 492, 780, and 1120 cm²/hen for CC, EC, and AV, respectively. The EC and AV chambers were equipped with nest boxes, perches, and a pecking/scratching area (PSA). In the AV chambers, hens had free access to a space arranged in three levels with a wood shaving litter on the ground level as a PSA. Hen-day production was recorded and egg quality assessment included egg cleanliness, weight and proportion of each component (albumen, yolk, and shell) but also pH, Haugh unit, and meat spots for albumen; color intensity and blood spots for yolk; thickness and resistance for shell. The laying rate and egg weight were similar for CC and EC (around 96.5% and 59.5 g; P > 0.05). For AV, these parameters were significantly lower (77.2% and 58.6 g; P < 0.001) but the differences compared to the cage systems progressively reduced across time. Nearby 70% of the eggs were laid in the nests with EC while almost all of the eggs were laid on the litter at ground level with AV. The rate of clean eggs was around 77% for both cage systems compared to 14% for AV. Most of egg quality traits were identical for the three systems (P > 0.05) but there was a lower yolk proportion for eggs laid in AV (25.2% versus 25.7% for cages systems; P < 0.001) and higher shell resistance for eggs laid in CC (40.7 N versus 39.3 N for alternative systems; P < 0.001). Lower laying performance observed with AV could be explained by higher animal activity and competition for facilities, but these factors were not measured in this study. The reduction of the difference in egg productivity over time compared to cage systems suggest the need for a period of training/ adaptation for pullets/hens kept in such an environment. An enriched cage system seems a balanced solution that combines both laying productivity and improved animal welfare. Further research should be performed to improve acceptance and appropriate use of resources by birds in an aviary system.
Two experiments were conducted to investigate the impact of increasing dietary levels of whole barley (WB) with or without exogenous enzymes and of whole wheat (WW) without E fed from 7 d of age, on performance and carcass characteristics of broilers. Experiment 1 was conducted with corn-soybean meal grower diets containing WB at 0, 10, 10 + enzymes, 15, or 15% + enzymes. The finisher diets contained, as fed, WB at 0, 15, 20 + enzymes, 15, or 20% + enzymes. In Experiment 2, grower diets contained 0, 10, 10, 20, or 20% WW with 0, 20, 35, 20, or 35% WW in the finisher diets. No enzymes were used for WW diets. In each Experiment, 1,500 1-d-old Ross x Ross male broilers were randomly distributed in 30 floor pens of 50 birds each. Six replicates were allotted to each treatment. Body weight, average daily gain (ADG), feed intake (FI), and feed efficiency ratio (FER) were measured at 7, 21, and at 38 d of age. In Experiment 1, ADG was lower (P < 0.05) in the control vs. Diet 5. However, FER with enzyme addition was lower, and FI with enzymes was higher (P < 0.05). Final BW, gizzard, and pancreas weights were higher (P < 0.05) with WB inclusion. In Experiment 2, ADG and BW significantly increased with addition of WW, although the response was best for Diets 2 and 3. Abdominal fat and carcass weights increased (P < 0.05) with the WW levels in the diets.
Ninety-six 1-day-old male broilers were fed a diet containing 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10% of a 1:1 mixture of pyruvic acid (PY) and dihydroxyacetone (DH) for ad libitum consumption for 42 days. Feed intake, body weight gain, and feed efficiency decreased linearly (P < .001) with increasing levels of PY and DH. There were no significant differences among treatments for abdominal fat percentage. Carcass chemical analysis revealed small but significant (P < .05) differences among dietary treatments for protein and fat percentages. In a second experiment, 192 1-day-old male broilers were fed diets containing 5% of PY, lactic acid (LA), citric acid (CI), DH, or glycerol (GY) or mixtures (1:1) of DH or GY in combination with each organic acid. Bird performance was impaired (P < .05) by PY or CI but not by DH or GY. Lactic acid reduced (P < .05) feed intake by 9% without affecting weight gain. Lactic acid plus DH, CI plus DH, and CI plus GY mixtures decreased (P < .05) bird performance but other combinations had no effect. Pyruvic acid or CI decreased abdominal fat and carcass lipid percentages. Dihydroxyacetone increased (P < .05) carcass lipid percentage and GY increased (P < .05) abdominal fat percentage. Lactic acid plus DH increased (P < .05) carcass lipid percentage. Only PY and CI decreased carcass fat deposition, but they also impaired broiler performance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.