BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis is one of the most frequent diseases occurring in the developed countries of the world. Since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy there has been a lack of agreement regarding the timing of the operation in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. METHODS: From September 2012 to January 2015 we carried out a prospective randomized trial at the IIIrd Surgical Department of University Hospital Milosrdní bratia in Bratislava. The aim of the trial was to compare the two basic approaches of the treatment of acute cholecystitis. During our trial, 62 patients with acute cholecystitis were admitted to the surgery department and 31 patients were treated with an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hours after the appearance of the symptoms. Other 31 patients were primarily treated with antibiotics and subsequently underwent a delayed cholecystectomy after 6-8 weeks. RESULTS: Our results suggest several advantages of the early laparoscopic cholecystectomy such as shorter operation time, lower conversion rate, shorter length of hospital stay, shorter postoperative convalescence and lower cost of hospitalization. CONCLUSION: According to these results we believe that immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy (within 24 hours from the patient's admission to hospital) should become a preferred method of treatment of the patients with acute cholecystitis (Tab. 1, Fig. 2

BACKGROUND: Thymectomy is indicated in patients with seropositive myasthenia gravis (SPMG) in patients under the age of 50 and in patient with myasthenia gravis (MG) associated with thymoma. METHODS: 345 patients with MG who underwent an extended thymectomy from April 1990 to December 2010. Patients were separated into the 4 groups: group with a complete stable remission, pharmacological remission group, group of patients with signifi cant improvement and the group with mild improvement of symptoms. RESULTS: In our study, we observed 345 patients with MG and thymectomy. 137 patients (39.71 %) attained the complete stable remission (CSR) and 92 patients (26.67 %) the pharmacological remission (PR). The signifi cant improvement of MG symptomatology was achieved in 95 patients (27.54 %). The rest of 21 patients from total 345 (6.08 %) have reached only a mild improvement. Patients after thymectomy with CSR were in the clinical stage I and IIA, in accordance to the modifi ed Osserman classifi cation and most benefi ted from the thymectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The extended thymectomy combined with immunotherapy is the preferred treatment with an expected satisfactory long-term remission rate. Despite the recent improvements in MG medical therapy, thymectomy plays an important role in the otherwise complex treatment of the disease. Because of early diagnosis with thymectomy performed without a delay, patients can achieve signifi cantly more often favorable outcomes and even stable remissions (Tab. 4, Fig. 7, Ref. 17).

In past decades, both prognosis and therapy of rectal cancer patients showed significant improvement. On the other hand, the incidence of rectal carcinoma continues to have a rising tendency. According to current UICC classification, patients in stage II rectal cancer or higher are indicated for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently the most common diagnostic method used for preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Several studies already pointed out the inaccuracy of preoperative lymph node staging in patients with rectal cancer. The present study analyzed overall accuracy of MRI staging of rectal cancer and thus its accuracy in neoadjuvant therapy indication, by comparing preoperative MRI staging with definitive histopathologic results from resected tumors. This study evaluated cases of 92 patients with rectal tumor that underwent MRI examination followed by surgical resection. Tumors included in the analysis were ranging from T1 to T3b according to the TNM staging, with free circumferential resection margin (CRM), distance form mesorectal fascia more than 5 mm, negative intersphincteric plane and also negative extramural venous invasion (EMVI), while the N stage was not decisive. In all cases, both N-staging and T-staging were evaluated histologically and compared with preoperative MRI results. Significant difference in preoperative and postoperative N-staging was shown in 51 patients (61.45%). In majority of cases MRI lead to over-staging, which was observed in 44 cases (53.1 %), with complete negativity of lymph nodes proven by histological examination in 34 cases. On the other hand, under-staging of lymph nodes was observed only in 7 cases (7.4 %). The T-staging did not show significant differences. Results from this study confirm that MRI plays an important role in T-staging of rectal tumors, however, there are undoubtedly issues in N-staging of tumors, which should lead to reevaluation of neoadjuvant therapy indication in patients with positive lymph nodes according to MRI examination. Based on the results of this study, we see the future of preoperative staging of rectal tumors in precise T-staging together with accurate assessment of CRM and distance of tumor from mesorectal fascia as well as evaluation of intersphinteric plane and EMVI.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the indication of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with middle and low rectal cancer based on MRI examination. BACKGROUND: In spite of noticeable advances in the diagnosis of rectal cancer, the optimal treatment remains highly debated. Current guidelines advise the use of neoadjuvant therapy in UICC stage II patients or higher. However, in clinical praxis, there is gradual implementation of new criterions and variables used in rectal cancer stage evaluation, the fact of which infl uences the treatment choice. The most important emerging variables taken currently into account are the distance from mesorectal fascia, circumferential resection margin, extramural venous invasion and intersphincteric plane, all of which can be evaluated using the MRI examination. METHODS: The accuracy of MRI staging was compared with defi nite histopathological results from resected tumors. Patient data were prospectively collected between the years 2013 and 2018 at 3rd Surgical Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia. Data from 101 patients were gathered and divided into two groups, according to the localization of tumor within rectum, while 9 patients were excluded from the study because of benign lesion diagnosis based upon fi nal histopathologic evaluation. RESULTS: In 92 evaluated patients, no signifi cant change was noted between MRI and histopathological T-staging. However, in N-staging, signifi cant differences were noted between preoperative MRI staging and postoperative histopathological staging. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate ineffi cient preoperative lymph node staging, suggesting overtreatment of rectal cancer patients. Although the use of neoadjuvant therapy has led to great advances in modern cancer treatment, it is connected with a number of side effects and therefore should be indicated only for patients who can benefi t from this treatment (Tab. 1, Fig. 3, Ref. 16). Text in PDF www.elis.sk.