The Haemodynamic response to dopamine infusion has been assessed in 30 patients in septic shock with myocardial dysfunction. Dopamine infusion resulted in a haemodynamic improvement as indicated by significant increases in cardiac output of 38.4% (p less than .001), stroke volume 18.7% (p less than .001), and mean arterial pressure of 33% (p less than .001). Despite the inotropic effect, left ventricular filling pressure did not change in 20 cases and increased in 10 cases. Mean peripheral resistance remained unchanged with a scatter of individual responses depending upon factors such as dopamine dose and initial vascular resistance. Dopamine increased intrapulmonary shunting by 48% (p less than .001), insignificantly decreased PaO2, increased mixed venous oxygen saturation by 16% (p less than .02) and decreased pulmonary vascular resistance by 15% (p less than .02). Both isoprenaline and dopamine improve stroke volume by an inotropic action, with an increase in venous return in the case of the latter and a reduction in afterload in the former. It is concluded that the usefulness of dopamine in septic shock may be limited in patients with previous myocardial disease because of the risk of increasing preload and in hypoxaemic patients because of the risk of increasing intrapulmonary shunting.
All patients admitted during a 33-month period to a multidisciplinary intensive care unit were prospectively studied in order to determine the incidence and severity of drug-induced illness leading to the admission. The role of underlying diseases was assessed and the avoidability of drug-induced illness considered. Out of 1651 patients, 97 (5.88%) were admitted because of drug-induced illness; 74 of these had serious underlying diseases. 13 (13.4%) of the 97 patients died, but underlying diseases accounted for 4 of the 13 fatalities. In nearly half of the cases, the drug-induced illness appeared potentially avoidable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.