Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) Mendiskripsikan profil Agroindustri Bawang Goreng Ali Masni dan (2) Menganalisis besarnya nilai tambah yang diperoleh dari pengolahan bawang goreng pada Agroindustri Bawang Goreng Ali Masni. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode studi kasus. Analisis data yang digunakan untuk menganalisis besarnya nilai tambah menggunakan metode Hayami. Produk bawang goreng yang dihasilkan dari Agroindustri Bawang Goreng Ali Masni adalah bawang goreng kelas satu, kelas dua dan kelas tiga. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa nilai tambah yang dihasilkan oleh Agroindustri Bawang Goreng Ali Masni untuk produk bawang goreng kelas satu sebesar Rp 16.757,903/kg dengan rasio nilai tambah sebesar 52,368% yang tergolong tinggi dan produk bawang goreng kelas dua sebesar Rp 10.857,903/kg dengan rasio nilai tambah sebesar 45,241% yang tergolong tinggi, sedangkan produk bawang goreng kelas tiga sebesar Rp 5.602,474/kg dengan rasio nilai tambah sebesar 31,125% yang tergolong sedang.
This research is motivated by the low level of public education in the Koto Baru district and how the government responds in overcoming educational problems in the Koto Baru district. This study aims to describe: what are the factors causing the low level of public education in Nagari Koto Baru and how governments tackle this problems. This research is a qualitative descriptive study using data collection techniques by observation, interviews, and documentation studies. (3) The informants in this study were 4 upper class people, 6 lower class people, 4 teachers or educators, 1 Wali Nagari Koto Baru. The research results show that low level of education in village of Koto Baru caused by low level of parent’s education, bad transportations and lack of teacher. Based on this research, it is hoped that parents and the local government will always be able to motivate and supervise children in pursuing their education.
The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) is an effective and efficient rice farming technique to increase the rice yield. However, the preliminary finding indicates that most farmers are reluctant to apply the SRI farming system because it takes a lot of time and is more complicated than conventional rice farming systems. The aims of this research are to examine the working time allocation on both SRI and Non-SRI farming systems and investigate the difference between both farming systems. This research was conducted in two regions of West Sumatera to represent upland and lowland areas during the period of Mei – June 2018. The region that represents the upland area is Simarosok Village in the district of Agam, and the lowland area is Kasang Village in the district of Padang Pariaman. The research found that the average working time allocation on the SRI farming system was 145.41 man day/Ha, while on the non-SRI farming system was 91.40 man day/Ha. Thus there was a significant difference between time allocation on SRI and Non-SRI farming systems in West Sumatera. Working time allocation on the SRI farming system was higher than the non-SRI farming system in the following activities: planting, weeding, making of organic fertilizer, and time to control the irrigation. Based on findings, it is suggested to the government and other related parties to provide appropriate weeding technology as well as organic fertilizer. Moreover, the farmers should be able to split time wisely between SRI farming and other business.
AbstrakDalam penjualan hasil produksi sering ditemukan petani mendapatkan proporsi keuntungan yang rendah dan pedagang perantara mendapatkan proporsi keuntungan yang tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis proporsional keuntungan lembaga tataniaganya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metoda survai dengan pengambilan sampel petani beras merah organik sebanyak 7 orang petani secara sensus dan sampel pedagang perantara berdasarkan keterlibatan pemasaran dengan petani. Dari hasil penelitian didapatkan 2 macam saluran tataniaga beras merah organik, yaitu 1). Petani/pedagang pengecer à Konsumen, 2) Petani à Pedagang pengumpul/Pengecer à Konsumen. Dari analisis didapatkan pada saluran tataniaga 1 keuntungan yang diterima sama dengan keuntungan proporsional karena merupakan saluran tataniaga langsung. Pada saluran tataniaga 2 keuntungan lembaga tataniaga tidak proporsional dimana petani mendapatkan keuntungan yang diterima lebih rendah dari keuntungan proporsionalnya dan pedagang pengumpul/pengecer mendapatkan keuntungan yang diterima lebih tinggi dari keuntungan proporsionalnya, sehingga saluran tataniaga 2 tidak efisien. Disarankan diadakan penyuluhan analisa usahatani pada petani tentang menghitung biaya usahatani, penyadaran pada petani bahwa menjual hasil produksi adalah masalah bisnis dan memberi informasi pasar pada petani.Kata kunci : beras merah organik, keuntungan diterima, keuntungan proporsional.AbstractIn the sale of produce, it is often found that farmers get a low proportion of profits, while middlemen get a high proportion of profit. The aims of this study to analyze the efficiency of the marketing channel. The study used a survey method and data were gathered from 7 farmers who chose census and intermediary traders. The research finds that there are 2 types of the marketing channels which are: 1) Farmers/retailers → Consumers, 2) Farmers →wholesalers/retailers→ Consumers. Moreover, there was proportional shared profit among the marketing channels 1, where the profits received by farmers/retailers was the same with its proportional profit. But, there was no proportional shared profit among marketing channels 2, where the profits received by farmers was lower than its proportional profits, and on the other hand the profits of wholesalers/retailers, were higher than their proportional profits, so that the marketing channels were inefficient.Keywords: organic brown rice, profit received, proportional profit
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.