TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractFlow assurance is a key priority for the subsea community as it is being challenged to provide answers to the following question: Can we manage the risk of hydrocarbons flow interruptions while optimizing the system performance using current flow assurance practice?Traditionally, flow assurance has focused on evaluating potential production problems associated with produced fluid issue such as waxes, asphaltenes, hydrates and scale. A combination of fluid sampling, laboratory techniques, and predictive modeling are then used for system selection and design of prevention and remediation strategies. These are often based on conservative modeling practices using incomplete or inconsistent data sets. No allowance for continuous monitoring that will provide data needed to recalibrate the system or to change the course of the process over the subsequent years is made. The result is often an overly conservative system design and operating strategy.The paper discusses a more dynamic approach to answering the above question as it explores the integration of the design and surveillance processes. Advances in sampling, analysis and modeling that reduce conservatism in design are reviewed. The role of real-time measurements during production from the reservoir, the wellbore, and the subsea infrastructure, in monitoring and optimization of a system is then discussed. Specific case examples are presented throughout to illustrate these points..

TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractA number of industry sources have identified the need to improve overall productivity of subsea wells through the application of monitoring and control systems in the wellbore and on the seabed. To achieve this goal, two elements must be mastered: information and measurements of key attributes of the well/reservoir productivity, and a means to change and command the process, preferably through remote-controlled devices rather than traditional well intervention.With the advent of intelligent wells, the second element has been addressed through a variety of process control devices used at different points in the wellbore and on the seabed. However, the growth of this process was limited by the absence of effective information gathering and data transmission systems in subsea wells, which remained underdeveloped compared to other subsea hardware. This resulted in systematic information bottlenecking caused by poor connectivity between the wellbore and the rest of the subsea infrastructure.The paper introduces a complementary surveillance system that works with existing subsea devices and highlights its role in gathering and transmitting well and subsea data reliably and in sufficient time needed to maintain optimal production. In particular, the system targets high data traffic areas in order to de-bottleneck the subsea transmission systems and provides wellbore monitoring and inflow quantification. A continuous data highway is now available to both wellbore and subseabased measurements, leading to improved monitoring and control of the entire subsea system.The applications and benefits of the system are demonstrated through a case study. The study discusses the role of the surveillance system in bringing the productivity index of subsea wells to be in par with the platform wells. It also demonstrates the need to rethink the flow assurance process as increasing number of distributed seabed measurements become available to the subsea industry and tieback distances increase to make the best use of expensive host facilities. IntroductionLooking at history. The first subsea Christmas tree was installed in 1961. In the following 37 years, the industry installed 1,000 subsea wells. In the coming 5 years, well over 1,000 will be commissioned; we are in a period of exponential growth, limited mainly by industry capacity. Total subsea capital expenditures during next 5 years will increase from US$34 billion to more than US$48 billion. The majority of this spending will be in the North Sea and the deepwater Golden Triangle: Gulf of Mexico, Brazil, and West Africa.With field productivity and process optimization continuing to drive the oilfield towards lowering the risk of subsea developments and enhancing production, it is time to embrace the pivotal role of real-time information to achieving these goals.We believe the answer to increased subsea productivity is real-time data combined with scalable, integrated, pore-toprocess systems. Data-rich solutions offer a better under...

No abstract