Purpose Craniopharyngioma is a pediatric brain tumor whose volume is prone to change during radiation therapy. We compared photon- and proton-based irradiation methods to determine the effect of tumor volume change on target coverage and normal tissue irradiation in these patients. Methods and Materials For this retrospective study, we acquired imaging and treatment-planning data from 14 children with craniopharyngioma (mean age, 5.1 years) irradiated with photons (54 Gy) and monitored by weekly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations during radiation therapy. Photon intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), double-scatter proton (DSP) therapy, and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans were created for each patient based on his or her pre-irradiation MRI. Target volumes were contoured on each weekly MRI scan for adaptive modeling. The measured differences in conformity index (CI) and normal tissue doses, including functional sub-volumes of the brain, were compared across the planning methods, as was target coverage based on changes in target volumes during treatment. Results CI and normal tissue dose values of IMPT plans were significantly better than those of the IMRT and DSP plans (p < 0.01). Although IMRT plans had a higher CI and lower optic nerve doses (p < 0.01) than did DSP plans, DSP plans had lower cochlear, optic chiasm, brain, and scanned body doses (p < 0.01). The mean planning target volume (PTV) at baseline was 54.8 cm3, and the mean increase in PTV was 11.3% over the course of treatment. The dose to 95% of the PTV was correlated with a change in the PTV; the R2 values for all models, 0.73 (IMRT), 0.38 (DSP), and 0.62 (IMPT), were significant (p < 0.01). Conclusions Compared with photon IMRT, proton therapy has the potential to significantly reduce whole-brain and -body irradiation in pediatric patients with craniopharyngioma. IMPT is the most conformal method and spares the most normal tissue; however, it is highly sensitive to target volume changes, whereas the DSP method is not.

An orthopaedic assessment of the joint status of seven severe haemophiliacs (mean age 12.5 y - range 8.9-15.5) on prophylactic treatment (PT) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and physical examination was carried out. Median duration of PT of these patients was 84 months (range 32-107). A locally designed MRI joint score considering seven parameters (1 - joint effusion, 2 - synovial membrane thickening, 3 - haemosiderin deposits, 4 - joint cartilage injury, 5 - subchondral bone erosion, 6 - subchondral bone cysts, 7 - osteonecrosis) was used (maximum score = 13 points). MRI scans were performed in 17 joints (nine ankles, seven knees and one elbow): mean MRI scores for the affected joints was 5.1. A poor consistency between physical examination and MRI findings or the real extent of joint damage was found (Cohen kappa index 0.320). MRI is a precise non-invasive tool for the assessment of early joint cartilage and synovium pathological changes still undetectable by physical examination or conventional X-rays in the haemophilic setting.

Purpose Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) represents 90% of all chronic prostatitis cases and may occur after radiation therapy (RT) for localized prostate cancer. Medical therapy is effective in approximately 50% of cases, with no therapy demonstrating consistent efficacy in refractory cases. Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is effective in men with lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia. We report clinical improvement after PAE in a case series of men with CP/CPPS after RT. Methods and Materials Nine men (median age 72 years; range, 61-83 years) with CP/CPPS after RT for prostate cancer underwent PAE. Baseline International Prostate Symptom Score was recorded in 5 patients (median 23; range, 4-26), Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index score in 6 patients (median 22.5; range, 6-34), and quality of life (QoL) score in 8 patients (median 5; range, 2-6). Median baseline prostate volume was 49 cm 3 (range, 22-123 cm 3 ). Patients were followed up at 6 and 12 weeks with QoL, International Prostate Symptom Score, and/or Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index score and magnetic resonance imaging. Results Technical success (ie, bilateral embolization) was achieved in 78% (n = 7) of patients with the other 2 patients having undergone unilateral embolization with no major complications. Clinical success was seen in 89% (n = 8) of patients and QoL improved in 78% (n = 7) during the follow-up period. Conclusion CP/CPPS after RT for localized prostate cancer is a highly morbid condition, with medical therapy successful in only 50% of cases. PAE may be a successful therapy for medically recalcitrant CP/CPPS, and further studies are necessary to understand the best patient selection and scenario for PAE in the setting of CP/CPPS.

No abstract

No abstract