This article concentrates on the finite element (FE) modelling approach to model welded thin-walled beam and the adoption of model updating technique to enhance the dynamic characteristic of the FE model. Four different types of element connectors which are RBE2, CBAR, CBEAM and CELAS format are used to construct the FE model of welded structure. Normal mode analysis is performed using finite element analysis (FEA) software, MSC Patran/Nastran to extract the modal parameters (natural frequency and mode shape) of the FE model. The precision of predicted modal parameters obtained from the four models of welded structure are compared with the measured counterparts. The dynamic characteristics of a measured counterpart is obtained through experimental modal analysis (EMA) using impact hammer method with roving accelerometer under free-free boundary conditions. In correlation process, the CBAR model has been selected for updating purposes due to its accuracy in prediction with measured counterparts and contains updating parameters compared to the others. Ahead of the updating process, sensitivity analysis is made to select the most sensitive parameter for updating purpose. Optimization algorithm in MSC Nastran is used in FE model updating process. As a result, the discrepancy between EMA and FEA is managed to be reduced. It shows the percentage of error for updated CBAR model shrinks from 7.85 % to 2.07 % when compared with measured counterpart. Hence, it is found that using FE model updating process provides an efficient and systemic way to perform a feasible FE model in replicating the real structure.
There are a lot of study regarding on the aircraft components. One of the critical components for an aircraft would be the wings. The wing structure of an aircraft is one of the complex structures of a designed aircraft. This paper is about identifying the modal properties which are the mode shape and the corresponding natural frequencies of the aircraft wing structure. The modal properties of the wing structure would be compared for two different materials applied towards the wing structures which are the aluminium alloy AA-7075-T6 and AA-2024-T3 which currently being widely used by the aircrafts. The study for this aircraft wing structure would be using the approach of finite element analysis (FEA) method. The 3D model is design by using SolidWorks. The modal properties are identified with the help of MSC PATRAN and MSC NASTRAN. The results obtained for both materials for 10 mode shapes are compared and it could be observed that AA-7075-T6 are much lower compared to AA-2024-T3. Hence, from the result, AA-7075-T6 is more suitable to be used for the wing structures.
In pursuance of deciding the dependability of data gathered by testing a finite element modal in the software version, experimental data is frequently used for validation. On account of finite element analysis, it can sometimes be considered as inaccurate particularly when applied to the complex structure, for example, a propeller blade. This is because of challenges that may happen in the modelling of joints, boundary conditions, and damping of the structure. In this research, a procedure of correlation and validation of the model-based test plan with modal testing results was conducted. Modal properties (normal frequencies, mode shapes, and damping ratio) of a propeller blade structure were resolved by using both test experimental modal analysis (EMA) and finite element analysis (FEA). Correlation of both sets of data was performed for validation. It created the impression that there was a noticeable estimation of error between those two sets of data. Small discrepancies of percentage error of obtained natural frequency for FEA and EMA makes both of the methods can be applied to determine the dynamic characteristic of the propeller structure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.