We analyzed whether acute treatment with serotonergic agonists would improve motor function in rats with transected spinal cords (spinal rats) and in rats that received transplants of fetal spinal cord into the transection site (transplant rats). Neonates received midthoracic spinal transections within 48 hr of birth; transplant rats received fetal (embryonic day 14) spinal cord grafts at the time of transection. At 3 weeks, rats began 1-2 months of training in treadmill locomotion. Rats in the transplant group developed better weight-supported stepping than spinal rats. Systemic administration of two directly acting agonists for serotonergic 5-HT(2) receptor subtypes, quipazine and (+/-)-1-[2, 5]-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl-2-aminopropane), further increased weight-supported stepping in transplant rats. The improvement was dose-dependent and greatest in rats with poor to moderate baseline weight support. In contrast, indirectly acting serotonergic agonists, which block reuptake of 5-HT (sertraline) or release 5-HT and block its reuptake (D-fenfluramine), failed to enhance motor function. Neither direct nor indirect agonists significantly improved locomotion in spinal rats as a group, despite equivalent upregulation of 5-HT(2) receptors in the lumbar ventral horn of lesioned rats with and without transplants. The distribution of immunoreactive serotonergic fibers within and caudal to the transplant did not appear to correspond to restoration of motor function. Our results confirm our previous demonstration that transplants improve motor performance in spinal rats. Additional stimulation with agonists at subtypes of 5-HT receptors produces a beneficial interaction with transplants that further improves motor competence.
In the present investigation, we studied whether neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) contributes to the rescue of axotomized Clarke's nucleus (CN) neurons in adult rats. A significant (24%) loss of CN neurons occurred at L-1 ipsilateral to T-8 hemisection by 14 days, which reached 31% at 2 months and then stabilized. Axotomized CN neurons had also atrophied by 14 days, but mean cell size did not decrease further. Animals that received gelfoam soaked in nerve growth factor, brain derived neurotrophic factor, or ciliary neurotrophic factor at the lesion site also showed a 30% neuron loss at 2 months, and a 40% reduction in average cell area. Rats receiving NT-3 showed a 15% neuron loss, which was not improved by additional neurotrophins in combination with NT-3. None of the treatments prevented neuron atrophy. Bioassay of the gelfoam showed that NT-3 bioactivity remained at 5 days after surgery but not at 14 days. Additional rats with hemisections that received NT-3 continuously via mini-pump for 2 months showed a 15% neuron loss, the same as with NT-3 given via gelfoam. These results indicate that even limited exposure of axotomized CN neurons to NT-3 produces permanent rescue of 50% of the neurons. The virtually complete rescue that we had previously observed with transplants of fetal central nervous system (CNS) tissues may, therefore, be due at least in part to NT-3, but the exogenous administration of a single neurotrophic factor or a combination of neurotrophic factors is less effective than transplants in producing long-term survival of axotomized CNS neurons.
Fetal transplants rescue axial muscle representations in M1 cortex of neonatally transected rats that develop weight support. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 3021-3030, 1998. Intraspinal transplants of fetal spinal tissue partly alleviate motor deficits caused by spinal cord injury. How transplants modify body representation and muscle recruitment by motor cortex is currently largely unknown. We compared electromyographic responses from motor cortex stimulation in normal adult rats, adult rats that received complete spinal cord transection at the T8-T10 segmental level as neonates (TX rats), and similarly transected rats receiving transplants of embryonic spinal cord (TP rats). Rats were also compared among treatments for level of weight support and motor performance. Sixty percent of TP rats showed unassisted weight-supported locomotion as adults, whereas approximately 30% of TX rats with no intervention showed unassisted weight-supported locomotion. In the weight-supporting animals we found that the transplants enabled motor responses to be evoked by microstimulation of areas of motor cortex that normally represent the lumbar axial muscles in rats. These same regions were silent in all TX rats with transections but no transplants, even those exhibiting locomotion with weight support. In weight-supporting TX rats low axial muscles could be recruited from the rostral cortical axial representation, which normally represents the neck and upper trunk. No operated animal, even those with well-integrated transplants and good weight-supported locomotion, had a hindlimb motor representation in cortex. The data demonstrate that spinal transplants allow the development of some functional interactions between areas of motor cortex and spinal cord that are not available to the rat lacking the intervention. The data also suggest that operated rats that achieve weight support may primarily use the axial muscles to steer the pelvis and hindlimbs indirectly rather than use explicit hindlimb control during weight-supported locomotion.
To determine whether embryonic spinal cord transplants retained the ability to prevent retrograde death of Clarke's nucleus (CN) neurons if supplied after a delay, we hemisected adult rats at the T8 spinal cord segment and placed transplants of fetal tissue into the hemisection cavity immediately or up to 14 days later. Transplants provided in the first 7 days after injury prevented virtually all of the 30% loss of CN neurons at L1 ipsilateral to hemisection that occurs without a transplant. Transplants supplied at 14 days post-hemisection were ineffective. Because prevention of retrograde neuron death is one mechanism by which transplants may contribute to locomotor recovery after spinal cord injury, this window of effectiveness should be considered in the design of clinical trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.