Alphonso mango fruits were harvested at different stages of maturity and grouped according to their specific gravity to determine the relationship between specific gravity and fruit maturity stage. Fruit quality characteristics; a* value, the stage of ripening, ripening %, TSS and total acidity percentage; proved that the specific gravity was a simple and reliable indicator to assess the maturity stages of Alphonso mango fruits. Fruits should be harvested at a specific gravity 1.01-1.02 (optimum mature fruits) followed by 1.0-1.01 (just mature fruits) in order to solve the problem of uneven ripening and to keep fruit quality, with minimum physiological disorder (internal breakdown). At 10°C, Alphonso mango fruits should not be stored more than three weeks to avoid the appearance of sever symptoms of chilling injury or internal breakdown during marketing period. MATERIALS AND METHODS Preliminary Experiment:Since mango fruit ripening mainly depends on reaching maturity stage, a preliminary experiment was carried out to determine the best maturity degree. Hence, Alphonso mango fruits were obtained from Al-Khatatba region in August 1998 and 1999, washed, weighed individually, volume was taken and specific gravity was calculated; then grouped according to specific gravity as follows:(1) 0.8-0.9(2) More than 0.9-1.0 (3) More than 1.0-1.01 (4) More than 1.01-1.02 (5)More than 1.02-1.03 (6) More than 1.03 Each group contained 15 fruits and replicated 3 times. Fruits were placed at 22°C and 90% relative humidity for 5 days including 2 days for ripening by acetylene gas (released from calcium carbide 2 g./ kg. fruit according to Kumar et al, 1996 ). Fruit characteristics were measured at harvest time and after 5 days from ripening treatment as follows:Physical Properties: Percentage of weight loss: Fruits were periodically weighed and the percentage of weight loss was calculated by the difference between the initial weight and that recorded at the date of sampling. Peel Colour Measurement (L, a & b values): was determined by using a Hunter colorimeter type (DP-9000) for the estimation of L, a, b values. The instrument was calibrated with white and black standards.
In order to determine the nutritional value of Egyptian mango fruits at harvest and at ripe stage, seven cultivars; namely Zebdda, Misk, Alphonso, Tomy Atkins, Mabruka, Compania and Hindy Sinnara; were evaluated. The obtained results showed that total carbohydrates, dry matter, cellulose and lignin percentage declined towards ripening stage. Misk recorded the highest content of crude fiber, total dietary fibers, cellulose, potassium, calcium and zinc. Alphonso recorded the highest magnesium content and the second highest content of potassium and calcium following Misk.Although Mabruka recorded the least percentage of total carbohydrates, fatty acid, calories and zinc among the seven cultivars, it contained the highest percentage of neutral detergent fibers (NDF) and acid detergent fibers (ADF). Zebdda contained the highest percentage of total carbohydrates, fatty acid and calories. Tomy Atkins and Misk attained the highest percentage of iron and copper. Hindy Sinnara had the highest T.S.S. and the least total acidity percentage at ripe stage. Compania attained the least value of soluble and insoluble dietary fibers, potassium and calcium. keyword: fruit composition dietary fibers mineral content maturity and ripe stage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.