Background: Somatic disorders and somatic symptoms are common in primary care populations; however, little is known about the prevalence in surgical populations. Identification of inpatients with high somatic symptom burden and psychological co-morbidity could improve access to effective psychological therapies. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis ( n = 465) from a prospective longitudinal cohort study of consecutive adult admissions with non-traumatic abdominal pain, at a tertiary hospital in New South Wales, Australia. We estimated somatic symptom prevalence with the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 at three cut-points: moderate (⩾10), severe (⩾15) and ‘bothered a lot’ on ⩾3 symptoms; and psychological co-morbidity with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 at standard (⩾10) cut-points. We also examined gender differences for somatic symptoms and psychological co-morbidity. Results: Prevalence was moderate (52%), female predominance (odds ratio = 1.71; 95% confidence interval = [1.18, 2.48]), severe (20%), no gender difference (1.32; [0.83, 2.10]) and ‘bothered a lot’ on ⩾3 symptoms (53%), female predominance (2.07; [1.42, 3.03]). Co-morbidity of depressive, anxiety and somatic symptoms ranged from 8.2% to 15.9% with no gender differences. Conclusion: Somatic symptoms were common and psychological triple co-morbidity occurred in one-sixth of a clinical population admitted for abdominal pain. Co-ordinated surgical and psychological clinical intervention and changes in clinical service organisation may be warranted to provide optimal care.

Background Somatic syndromes are present in 30 per cent of primary healthcare populations and are associated with increased health service use and health costs. Less is known about secondary care surgical inpatient populations. Methods This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study (n = 465) of consecutive adult admissions with an episode of non-traumatic abdominal pain, to the Acute General Surgical Unit at a tertiary hospital in New South Wales, Australia. Somatic symptom severity (SSS) was dichotomized using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-15 with a cut-off point of 10 or higher (medium–high SSS) and compared pre-admission and during admission. Total healthcare utilization and direct costs were stratified by a PHQ-15 score of 10 or higher. Linear regression was used to examine differences in costs, and a multivariable linear regression was used to examine the relationship of PHQ-15 scores of 10 or higher to total costs, reported as mean total costs of care and percentage difference (95 per cent confidence intervals). Results Fifty-two per cent (n = 242) of participants had a medium–high SSS with greater pre-admission and admission interval health service costs. Mean total direct costs of care were 25 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 8 to 44 per cent) higher in the PHQ-15 score of 10 or higher group: mean difference €1401.93 (95 per cent c.i. €512.19 to €2273.67). The multivariable model showed a significant association of PHQ-15 scores of 10 or higher (2.1 per cent; 0.2–4.1 per cent greater for each one-point increase in score) with total hospital costs, although the strongest contributions to cost were older age, operative management, and lower socioeconomic level. There was a linear relationship between PHQ scores and total healthcare costs. Conclusions Medium to high levels of somatic symptoms are common in surgical inpatients with abdominal pain and are independently associated with greater healthcare utilization.

Introduction Undifferentiated pain, and pain out of proportion of diagnosed pathology are sources of frustration to clinician and patient. SSD is a DSM-V diagnosis that has consolidated the previous diagnoses of psychogenic pain. It is a health anxiety condition, where sufferers experience multiple somatic symptoms which cause anxiety and distress. This anxiety results in frequent ED and GP presentations, extensive investigations, and increased opioid prescription. However, opioids do little to alleviate symptoms. Treatment should focus on underlying anxiety and depression. Population studies show SSD prevalence to be 15-20%, however SSD has never been studied in the surgical population. We hypothesized that the rates of SSD in the surgical population reflects that in primary care, and that SSD sufferers are more likely to be prescribed opioid analgesia. Method Adult patients admitted with abdominal pain of any non-traumatic aetiology to the Acute General Surgical Unit at a major tertiary hospital are being screened for SSD using the PHQ-15 questionnaire, and opioid prescription is being recorded. Result 400 participants have been recruited with a total SSD prevalence of 20%. Opioid prescribing rises sharply with SSD diagnosis. The average opioid prescription appears to be 3 times higher in patients with SSD compared to those without. Conclusion Our data confirms an SSD prevalence of 20% in the surgical population. This is associated with increased opioid prescription. Early recognition of SSD and implementation of appropriate treatment could reduce hospital presentations, admissions and opioid prescription. We will continue recruitment to 800 participants by March 2020. Take-home message SSD is common in all populations, and results in increased hospital presentations, admissions and opioid prescription. Early recognition and implementation of appropriate treatment may reduce healthcare burden, improve patient outcomes, and reduce opioid prescription.