Echocardiography (Echo) has a myriad of clinical applications. Traditionally, it was performed and interpreted by cardiologist but the scope of its applications has lead physicians of other specialities to learn this useful skill. One of the newer and expanding scope of echocardiography is point-of-care (POC) echocardiography. In this review article, we aim to discuss the clinical applications of POC echo, common protocols and its limitations. Despite its widespread use, there is paucity of data describing its clinical efficacy and there is lack of guidelines regarding credentialing and quality control of POC echo.

BackgroundAccurate evaluation of the tricuspid regurgitant (TR) spectral Doppler signal is important during transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) evaluation for pulmonary hypertension (PHT). Contrast enhancement improves Doppler backscatter. However, its incremental benefit with contemporary scanners is less well established. The aim of this study was to assess whether the TR spectral Doppler signal using contemporary scanners was improved using a second generation contrast agent, Definity® (CE), compared to unenhanced TTE (UE).MethodsAnalysis of patients who underwent UE then CE TR interrogation was performed. TR signal was evaluated by an experienced reader and graded 1 (clear-high level of confidence of interpretation and complete spectral Doppler envelope), 2 (suboptimal with medium-low level of confidence of interpretation and incomplete envelope), 3 (poor-absent and no measurable spectral Doppler signal). Maximal TR velocity (TRV) was defined as peak velocity that could be clearly identified. An inexperienced sonographer read 30 randomly selected studies.Results176 TTE were performed in 173 patients (mean age 57 ± 14.8 years). Wilcoxon signed rank test demonstrated significant improvement (p < 0.0001) in TR spectral Doppler signal quality with CE TTE. Mean score CE TTE vs. TTE = 2.32 ± 0.85 vs. 2.56 ± 0.75 respectively (p < 0.0001). Mean maximal TRV CE TTE vs. UE TTE = 2.61 ± 0.44 m/s vs. 2.54 ± 0.49 m/s respectively (p < 0.0001). The inexperienced reader had a greater improvement in scoring CE TTE signals vs. UE TTE (p < 0.0001).ConclusionIn the era of contemporary scanners, CE improved the ability to detect and measure TRV, except in those with clear unenhanced TR spectral Doppler signals or greater than mild tricuspid regurgitation.

Traumatic coronary artery (CA) dissection is an extremely rare sequela of blunt chest trauma. Diagnosis of CA dissection in the setting of chest trauma is challenging. While conventionally coronary angiography has been the diagnostic tool of choice, modern imaging techniques such as optical coherence tomography can further improve diagnostic accuracy and help optimise treatment strategy. The ideal treatment modality for managing CA dissection has not been established with case reports revealing a range of treatment strategies ranging from CA bypass grafting to a completely conservative management. Here we present a case report of a 68‐year‐old man who suffered a traumatic proximal left anterior descending artery dissection as a consequence of a motor‐vehicle accident and was subsequently treated with a combination of conservative and interventional strategy with optimal patient outcome.

No abstract

No abstract