No abstract

No abstract

Background. Healthcare-associated infections are a relevant health-public issue because of their economic and social impact; thus, they represent a challenge for the health institutions and the personnel in charge of fighting the infections. Particularly, central venous catheter-associated infections require a long-period administration of antibiotics, which increases the catheter blockade. That may derive in replacing the catheter, more extended hospital stays, and a higher sepsis risk. Objective. To analyze the efficacy of the disinfectant cap (3M Curos®), compared to the traditional disinfection method of the needle-free connectors, catheters or disinfectant ports. Material and Methods. A systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost-effectiveness study were performed to determine the effectiveness of the disinfectant cap in order to define the efficiency compared to the traditional disinfection method. Univariate, multivariate, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to reduce uncertainty. Results. The disinfectant cap had an infection ratio of 1.54 infections per 1,000 catheters / day vs. traditional desinfection methods, which had a ratio of 4.84 infections per 1,000 catheters / day. Those results led to find a cost difference of $21,819.39 USD for 3M Curos® and $67,165.26 USD for traditional methods. Conclusions. The disinfectant cap proves to be a more efficient alternative for pediatric health in Mexico.