Odontoid fractures are frequent in patients over 70 years of age, and in patients over 80 years of age they form the majority of spinal fractures. In a retrospective analysis of 23 geriatric (> 70 years) patients with a fracture of the odontoid, we compared some of the clinical features to a contemporary series of patients younger than 70 years of age. Whereas in the younger patients high-energy trauma accounted for the majority of the fractures, low-energy falls were the underlying cause in 90% of the odontoid fractures in the elderly. In contrast to the younger age group, in elderly patients predominantly type II fractures (95%) were identified. Anterior and posterior displacement were recorded with equal frequency on the first postinjury radiograph in the younger age group, whereas in geriatric patients displacement was mainly posterior. The number of associated injuries was significantly higher in younger patients. There was no difference in the occurrence of neurological deficits (13%) between the two age groups, and neurological compromise was mainly related to posterior dislocation of the odontoid in both groups. The overall complication rate was significantly higher in elderly patients (52.2% vs 32.7%), with an associated in-hospital mortality of 34.8%. Loss of reduction and non-union after non-operative treatment, a complicated postoperative course and complications due to associated injuries accounted primarily for this high complication rate. Elderly patients with a fracture of the odontoid are a high-risk group with a high morbidity and mortality rate. An aggressive diagnostic approach to detect unstable fractures and application of a halo device or early primary internal stabilisation of these fractures is recommended.
Up to 15% of all fractures involve the clavicle. Nonunion of the clavicle is a rare complication after conservative treatment. It mainly presents as pain at the fracture site and a limited range of motion of the shoulder. The purpose of this study is to define a certain type of fracture of the clavicle that is predisposed to malunion and therefore should be treated surgically after failure of conservative treatment. Thirty-nine patients with delayed or malunion of the clavicle were analyzed. There were 13 women and 26 men. The average age of the male patients was 36.4 years (range 20-59 years) and of the female patients, 43.6 years (range 18-55 years). The mean follow-up period was 2.3 years (range 6 months to 4.2 years). All of them were treated surgically. There were 33 Allman I fractures and 6 Allman II fractures. Of the Allman I fractures, 30 (91%) were shortened by at least 2 cm. Allman I fractures were treated using a reconstruction plate or a dynamic compression plate in combination with bone grafting. The time of operation after fracture ranged from 6 weeks to 8.5 years (average 9.8 months). Pain at the fracture site was the leading symptom in all patients. At 6 months after the operation, 38 patients were free of pain with an unlimited range of motion of the shoulder. One patient (2.6%) complained of a slight weakness on the operated site. One fracture failed to unite (2.6%) and had to be replated. There were no refractures, infections, vessel or nerve lesions. To conclude, in Allman I fractures with a shortening of more than 2 cm, we recommend operative treatment in symptomatic patients if there are no signs of callus formation after 6 weeks.
IntroductionThe appropriate treatment of type II and III odontoid fractures still remains controversial. However in the recent literature there seems to be a tendency to opt for primary internal fixation with interfragmentary screws [1,7,8,19,23,29,36]. The reported rate of non-union varies between 2.4% and 100% for all types of fractures and treatment modalities, with the highest rates for untreated fractures and fractures treated with a cervical collar only. Important factors reported to contribute to non-union of these fracAbstract Despite various reports on the management of odontoid fractures, there is no consensus on the subject, and the appropriate treatment still remains controversial. While untreated fractures or fractures treated only with a cervical orthosis seem to have the highest rate of nonunion, the need for rigid external stabilisation has never been substantiated. In a retrospective analysis we reviewed 26 patients with acute type II and III fractures of the odontoid, treated with a cervical orthosis only. Study inclusion was limited to fractures that had a fracture gap of less than 2 mm, an initial antero-posterior displacement of less than 5 mm and angulation of less than 11°, less than 2 mm displacement on lateral flexion/extension views, and were without neurological deficits. These fractures were defined as stable. There were 19 (73.1%) type II and 7 (26.9%) type III fractures; in 10 (38.5%) of these fractures the odontoid was displaced and/or angulated. The overall complication rate was 11.4% (n=3). One patient suffered from pulmonary embolism, in two patients (7.7%) with initially minimally displaced fractures, secondary internal stabilisation had to be performed because of persistent instability. In 20 (77%) of the remaining fractures healing was uneventful. In 4 nondisplaced fractures (15%) fibrous union was documented. Three of these patients were over 65 years old. The overall fusion rate was 73.7% for type II and 85.7% for type III fractures. At follow-up 39% of the patients were free of symptoms; however, the clinical outcome did not correlate with the radiological findings. According to our findings, stable type II and type III fractures of the odontoid can be successfully treated with non-rigid immobilisation, even if they are displaced. A thorough assessment of the stability of the odontoid with lateral flexion/extension views or dynamic fluoroscopy is recommended to evaluate the appropriate treatment. Nonrigid immobilisation may be an option in selected cases with stable injuries.
The Alloclassic and Endoplus femoral stems have the same grit-blasted surface and are hot forged from the same titanium alloy. Only the external form of the implants differs slightly. It was our aim to examine the differences in radiographic bone response between the Alloclassic (second generation) and the Endoplus (third generation) femoral stems. We compared 79 prostheses in 70 matched patients studied over a minimum of two years. Radiolucent lines, adaptive bone remodelling, subsidence, heterotopic bone formation and lysis were recorded in the Gruen zones. Radiolucencies were mainly found in zones 1 and 7 but to a greater extent in the Endoplus than in the Alloclassic group (p < 0.001 in zone 1, p < 0.05 in zone 7). We found lucent lines in three or more Gruen zones in seven patients all of whom were in the Endoplus group (p < 0.05). Zones 2 and 6 had a significantly higher rate of lucencies in the Endoplus group (p < 0.001). We encountered a combination of proximal lucent lines in zones 1 and 7 with distal hypertrophy of the cortical bone in zones 2, 3, 5 and 6 in eight patients, all from the Endoplus group (p < 0.05). In other patients bone atrophy (stress shielding) in zones 2 and 6 was seen more frequently in the Endoplus than in the Alloclassic group (p < 0.001). In neither group was there radiological evidence of osteolysis. Heterotopic bone formation and subsidence occurred with similar frequency in both groups. Our study shows that a small change in the form of the femoral implant can result in statistically significant radiological changes in bone remodelling. Whether this will result in clinical compromise is unknown. However, it seems likely that the Endoplus femoral stem will perform differently from the Alloclassic.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.