Dopamine neurotransmitter and its receptors play a critical role in the cell signaling process responsible for information transfer in neurons functioning in the nervous system. Development of improved therapeutics for such disorders as Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia would be significantly enhanced with the availability of the 3D structure for the dopamine receptors and of the binding site for dopamine and other agonists and antagonists. We report here the 3D structure of the long isoform of the human D2 dopamine receptor, predicted from primary sequence using firstprinciples theoretical and computational techniques (i.e., we did not use bioinformatic or experimental 3D structural information in predicting structures). The predicted 3D structure is validated by comparison of the predicted binding site and the relative binding affinities of dopamine, three known dopamine agonists (antiparkinsonian), and seven known antagonists (antipsychotic) in the D2 receptor to experimentally determined values. These structures correctly predict the critical residues for binding dopamine and several antagonists, identified by mutation studies, and give relative binding affinities that correlate well with experiments. The predicted binding site for dopamine and agonists is located between transmembrane (TM) helices 3, 4, 5, and 6, whereas the best antagonists bind to a site involving TM helices 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 with minimal contacts to TM helix 5. We identify characteristic differences between the binding sites of agonists and antagonists.W ith the implication of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) in many diseases (1, 2), the need to solve the highresolution 3D structure of this class of integral membrane proteins to enable structure-based drug design is an important problem in structural biology. Despite the importance of solving the structure of the GPCRs, the only experimental 3D structure available for a GPCR is bovine rhodopsin. This lack of structures is because the GPCRs are bound to the membrane, making it difficult to express in sufficient quantities for crystallization.To provide structural and ligand binding information on GPCRs, we have been developing first-principles computational techniques for predicting the 3D structure of GPCRs using only the amino acid sequence (MembStruk) and for predicting binding site and binding energy of various ligands to GPCRs (HierDock). Using these techniques, we have reported the structure of olfactory receptors (3, 4), bovine rhodopsin (4, 5), and other GPCRs (4). Dopamine neurotransmitter plays a critical role in cellular signaling processes responsible for information transfer in neurons functioning in the nervous system (6, 7). Dopamine receptors (DR) belong to the superfamily of GPCRs, and to date there are five reported sequences for the human DR with multiple isoforms for each. The DRs may be subdivided based on their pharmacological behavior into the D1-like and the D2-like subfamilies, and these are ideal targets for treating schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease; th...
H istorically, the surgical management of intrinsic brainstem lesions has been controversial. The surgical extirpation of focal gliomas, cavernous malformations, or hemangioblastomas within the brainstem has caused heated discussions in scientific meetings and the literature. In 1939, Bailey et al. 3 declared this subject to be a pessimistic chapter in neurosurgery; 30 years later, Matson and Ingraham 26 would still claim such lesions were inoperable. However, in 1971, Lassiter et al. 25 were among the first to advocate surgical intervention. By 1986, Epstein and McCleary reported that surgery was feasible with reasonable morbidity and mortality.15 Concurrent with Epstein and McCleary's report, Raimondi would rationally state that to have the child merely survive (i.e., with severe neurological deficits) is no justification for surgery. 33 The development and improvement of complex skull base surgical approaches and incremental advances in neuroimaging, parallel to image-guided surgery, allowed a few authors to safely and effectively resect lesions in the brainstem. 5,23,32Knowledge of different skull base exposures, gained through laboratory dissections, allows neurosurgeons to approach lesions in the brainstem. Nevertheless, the brainstem, roughly the size of the human thumb, contains a rich concentration of nuclei and fibers in a small sectional area, resulting in a high likelihood of morbidity after manipulation. Awareness of the main safe entry zones on the brainstem is key to reducing morbidity for any lesion that does not emerge to the pial or ependymal surface. Such zones represent entry points and trajectories where eloquent structures and perforators are sparse and where a neurotomy would cause the least possible damage.abbreviatioNs CN = cranial nerve; mini-OZ = mini-modified orbitozygomatic approach; PCA = posterior cerebral artery; P 2 P = posterior P 2 ; SCA = superior cerebellar artery; TAPS = transanterior perforating substance. obJective The aim of this study was to enhance the planning and use of microsurgical resection techniques for intrinsic brainstem lesions by better defining anatomical safe entry zones. methods Five cadaveric heads were dissected using 10 surgical approaches per head. Stepwise dissections focused on the actual areas of brainstem surface that were exposed through each approach and an analysis of the structures found, as well as which safe entry zones were accessible via each of the 10 surgical windows. results Thirteen safe entry zones have been reported and validated for approaching lesions in the brainstem, including the anterior mesencephalic zone, lateral mesencephalic sulcus, intercollicular region, peritrigeminal zone, supratrigeminal zone, lateral pontine zone, supracollicular zone, infracollicular zone, median sulcus of the fourth ventricle, anterolateral and posterior median sulci of the medulla, olivary zone, and lateral medullary zone. A discussion of the approaches, anatomy, and limitations of these entry zones is included. coNclusioNs A detailed understanding...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.