In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, dyspnoea should be investigated at an early stage, even in the absence of obvious pleural or interstitial lung disease.

Background-In acute asthma the optimal duration of treatment with combination agonist and anticholinergic nebuliser solutions is unknown; most studies have investigated single doses or treatment for up to 12 hours. To determine whether longer treatment with ipratropium bromide might aid recovery a study was undertaken in 106 patients with acute asthma. Methods-A double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, three group study was performed with all patients receiving ipratropium for 12 hours and salbutamol for 60 hours after admission (both nebulised four hourly), systemic steroids and, if necessary, theophylline. At 12 hours ipratropium was stopped in group I (n = 35) but was continued in the other two groups, and at 36 hours ipratropium was also stopped in group II (n = 35) while patients in group III (n = 36) continued with ipratropium for 60 hours. Spirometric tests were performed before and after salbutamol, and again 30 and 60 minutes after ipratropium or placebo at 12, 36 and 60 hours. Peak flow rates (PEFR) were measured before and after each nebulisation. Results-There were no diVerences between the groups in PEFR on admission (group I: 214 l/min, group II: 198 l/min, group III: 221 l/min), or mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1 ) at 12 hours (group I: 1.8 l, group II: 2.0 l, group III: 2.2 l), 36 hours (group I: 2.1 l, group II: 2.3 l, group III: 2.4 l), or at 60 hours (group I: 2.2 l, group II: 2.3 l, group III 2.5 l). Despite this, median time to discharge was significantly higher for patients in group I (5.4 days) than for those in groups II (4.1 days) and III (4.0 days). Conclusions-Combination nebulised therapy can be continued beyond 12 hours and up to 36 hours after admission with improved recovery time. Lung function testing may not reflect the full benefit of treatment.

Nebulized bronchodilators are widely regarded as the optimal treatment for maintenance therapy in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of the study was to assess whether detailed physiological, functional and quality of life-related measurements can assist in determining the requirement for nebulized bronchodilator therapy in patients with moderate to severe COPD. This was an unblinded, randomized, crossover study that compared intermediate (120 mcg ipratropium bromide and 600 mcg of salbutamol using metered dose inhaler (MDI) and spacer) and high dose (nebulized 500 mcg ipratropium bromide and 2.5 mg salbutamol) bronchodilator therapy, on physiological, functional and quality of life-related measurements in patients with COPD. A total of 25 patients (12 female), mean (SD) age 68 (7) years, FEV(1) 45 (10) % predicted completed the study. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatments in the pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function values, six-minute walk distance, breathlessness score or quality of life questionnaires. Fifteen patients preferred bronchodilator therapy with nebulizer and 10 with MDI and spacer. In 20 patients at least one positive response in quality of life score, lung function or six-minute walk, was observed on the preferred treatment. Only a proportion of patients with moderate or severe COPD prefer nebulized bronchodilator therapy. This study found that none of the parameters singly or in combination were consistently predictive of patients' preference for nebulized bronchodilator therapy. Therefore, we suggest that clinicians institute a trial of stepping up to an intermediate dose of bronchodilators prior to introducing nebulized therapy.