INTRODUCTION With increased use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, prostate cancers are diagnosed at an earlier stage in younger men, when radical curative treatments are appropriate. Modifications of the PSA test such as PSA velocity and age-adjusted values are available to aid in the selection of patients for biopsy. However, it is not clear whether these data are used in general practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to all primary care practices within one region in the UK. A series of visual analogue questions designed to identify referral thresholds for age-adjusted PSA levels and PSA velocity were used to identify patterns in referral behaviour. RESULTS Individual family practitioners see only small numbers of patients requesting PSA tests or with newly diagnosed prostate cancer each year. The median (range) thresholds considered for referral at ages 45, 55, 65, 75 and 85 years were 4.5 ng/ml (2.5–15.5 ng/ml), 5.5 ng/ml (3.0–15.5 ng/ml), 6.5 ng/ml (3.5–15.5 ng/ml), 6.5 ng/ml (3.5–25.5 ng/ml), and 7.5 ng/ml (3.5–25.5 ng/ml), respectively. Only 5% of practitioners correctly identified the age-specific PSA threshold for referral of a 45-year-old man. CONCLUSIONS It is important to remember that younger men (even those in their forties and fifties) may be at risk of prostate cancer even if asymptomatic. It is important in a climate of increasing demand for PSA testing that those who initiate the process understand the implications and limitations of testing, including appropriate triggers for referral to secondary care. The exact approach required for the successful dissemination of this information to primary care is not clear, but our data suggest that a better understanding is required.

Objective: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic yield of 12 versus 15 core ultrasound-guided needle prostate biopsy protocol for detection of prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: 244 patients were prospectively randomized to undergo 12 (group A), or 15 (group B) biopsies. The cancer detection rate was compared between these groups and within group B. Results: There were no differences in the age, PSA, prostate volume or Gleason score of diagnosed cancers between groups. 113 (46%) of all patients were found to have carcinoma. The number of cancers diagnosed in each group was: 63 (51.6%) in group A, and 50 (41.0%) in group B. In both groups, performing 12 biopsies increased the number of cancer cases identified by around 10% compared to 6. The frequency of cancer cases increased when 15 biopsies were performed, but not significantly (1.7%). The probability of finding a cancer after 12 biopsies was the same as after 15 biopsies (p = 0.125, McNemar’s test). Conclusions: There was no advantage in increasing the number of biopsy cores from 12 to 15 for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in men with an elevated PSA but normal digital rectal examination.