To evaluate the efficacy of flushing the uterine cavity with lidocaine before hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) to reduce procedure-related pain. Design: A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shamir Medical Center, Israel between June 2020 and September 2020 involving 80 women undergoing a HyFoSy procedure. Setting: University-affiliated medical center. Patients: A total of 40 women were assigned randomly to the lidocaine group and 40 to the saline (placebo) group using a predetermined randomization code. Intrauterine instillation before the procedure consisting of either lidocaine 2% or normal saline alone was conducted, respectively. Interventions: The primary outcome measure was the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score during the phase of intrauterine foam instillation reported by the women after the procedure. The VAS consisted of a 10-cm line ranging from 0 to 10 (anchored by 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain). On the basis of the VAS scores, the pain level ratings were classified as mild (rated 1−3), moderate (4−6), or severe (7−10). Measurements and Main Results: The patient characteristics and obstetric data were found to be similar in both groups. Comparison of the VAS pain scores experienced during the procedure showed that women in the lidocaine flushing group rated the procedure less painful than the women in the saline group (3.0 § 1.3 vs 6.3 § 1.5, respectively; p = .001). The incidence of severe pain was significantly lower in the lidocaine group than the saline group (2.5% and 45.0%, respectively, p = .001). Conclusion: Lidocaine flushing of the uterine cavity before HyFoSy significantly decreased the pain known to be caused by this procedure and had the advantage of no side effects. It is easily applied, relatively inexpensive, and may affect compliance with this procedure.

Purpose: to summarize and present a single tertiary center's 25 years of experience managing patients with caesarean scar pregnancies and their long term reproductive and obstetric outcomes.Methods: A 25-year retrospective study included women diagnosed with CSP from 1996 to 2020 in one tertiary center. Data were retrieved from the medical records and through a telephone interview. Diagnosis was made by sonography and color Doppler. Treatments included methotrexate, suction curettage, hysteroscopy, embolization and wedge resection by laparoscopy or laparotomy as a function of the clinical manifestations, the physicians' decisions, patient counseling, and parental requests.Results: Analysis of the records recovered 60 cases of CSP (two of whom were recurrent). All patients had complete resolution with no indication for hysterectomy. Thirty-ve patients had a long-term follow-up, of whom 24 (68.6%) attempted to conceive again and 22 (91.6%) succeeded. There were 17/22 (77.3%) patients with at least one live birth, 3/22 (13.6%) spontaneous miscarriages and 2/22 (9%) recurrent CSP.The obstetric complications included abnormal placentation 5/19 (26.3%), premature rupture of membranes 2/19 (10.5%), preterm delivery 4/19 (21%) and abnormality of the uterine scar 2/19 (10.5%).There was one case of neonatal death due to complications of prematurity 1/19 (5.2%).Conclusion: CSP treatment focusing on reducing morbidity and preserving fertility has favorable long term reproductive and obstetric outcomes. In subsequent pregnancies, we recommend performing an early rst trimester vaginal scan to map the location of the new pregnancy, followed by close monitoring given the obstetric complications mentioned above.

Purpose: to summarize and present a single tertiary center’s 25 years of experience managing patients with caesarean scar pregnancies and their long term reproductive and obstetric outcomes. Methods: A 25-year retrospective study included women diagnosed with CSP from 1996 to 2020 in one tertiary center. Data were retrieved from the medical records and through a telephone interview. Diagnosis was made by sonography and color Doppler. Treatments included methotrexate, suction curettage, hysteroscopy, embolization and wedge resection by laparoscopy or laparotomy as a function of the clinical manifestations, the physicians’ decisions, patient counseling, and parental requests. Results: Analysis of the records recovered 60 cases of CSP (two of whom were recurrent). All patients had complete resolution with no indication for hysterectomy. Thirty-five patients had a long-term follow-up, of whom 24 (68.6%) attempted to conceive again and 22 (91.6%) succeeded. There were 17/22 (77.3%) patients with at least one live birth, 3/22 (13.6%) spontaneous miscarriages and 2/22 (9%) recurrent CSP. The obstetric complications included abnormal placentation 5/19 (26.3%), premature rupture of membranes 2/19 (10.5%), preterm delivery 4/19 (21%) and abnormality of the uterine scar 2/19 (10.5%). There was one case of neonatal death due to complications of prematurity 1/19 (5.2%). Conclusion: CSP treatment focusing on reducing morbidity and preserving fertility has favorable long term reproductive and obstetric outcomes. In subsequent pregnancies, we recommend performing an early first trimester vaginal scan to map the location of the new pregnancy, followed by close monitoring given the obstetric complications mentioned above.