Susceptibility testing of the polymyxins (colistin and polymyxin B) is challenging for clinical laboratories. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee evaluated two methods to enable accurate testing of these agents. These methods were a colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) and a colistin agar test (CAT), the latter of which was evaluated using two inoculum volumes, 1 μl (CAT-1) and 10 μl (CAT-10). The methods were evaluated using a collection of 270 isolates of Enterobacterales, 122 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, and 106 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Overall, 94.4% of CBDE results were in essential agreement and 97.9% in categorical agreement (CA) with reference broth microdilution MICs. Nine very major errors (VME; 3.2%) and 3 major errors (ME; 0.9%) were observed. With the CBDE, 98.6% CA was observed for Enterobacterales (2.5% VME, 0% ME), 99.3% CA was observed for P. aeruginosa (0% VME, 0.7% ME), and 93.1% CA was observed for Acinetobacter spp. (5.6% VME, 3.3% ME). Overall, CA was 94.9% with 6.8% VME using CAT-1 and improved to 98.3% with 3.9% VME using CAT-10. No ME were observed using either CAT-1 or CAT-10. Using the CAT-1/CAT-10, the CA observed was 99.4%/99.7% for Enterobacterales (1%/0.5% VME), 98.7%/100% for P. aeruginosa (8.3%/0% VME), and 88.5%/92.3% for Acinetobacter spp. (21.4%/14.3% VME). Based on these data, the CLSI antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) subcommittee endorsed the CBDE and CAT-10 methods for colistin testing of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa.

Progress in the study of circulating, cell-free nuclear DNA (ccf-nDNA) in cancer detection has led to the development of non-invasive clinical diagnostic tests and has accelerated the evaluation of ccf-nDNA abundance as a disease biomarker. Likewise, circulating, cell-free mitochondrial DNA (ccf-mtDNA) is under similar investigation. However, optimal ccf-mtDNA isolation parameters have not been established, and inconsistent protocols for ccf-nDNA collection, storage, and analysis have hindered its clinical utility. Until now, no studies have established a method for high throughput isolation that considers both ccf-nDNA and ccf-mtDNA. We initially optimized human plasma digestion and extraction conditions for maximal recovery of these DNAs using a magnetic bead-based isolation method. However, when we incorporated this method onto a high throughput platform, initial experiments found that DNA isolated from identical human plasma samples displayed plate edge effects resulting in low ccf-mtDNA reproducibility, while ccf-nDNA was less affected. Therefore, we developed a detailed protocol optimized for both ccf-mtDNA and ccf-nDNA recovery that uses a magnetic bead-based isolation process on an automated 96-well platform. Overall, we calculate an improved efficiency of recovery of ~95-fold for ccf-mtDNA and 20-fold for ccf-nDNA when compared to the initial procedure. Digestion conditions, liquid handling characteristics, and magnetic particle processor programming all contributed to increased recovery and without detectable positional effects. To our knowledge, this is the first high throughput approach optimized for ccf-mtDNA and ccf-nDNA recovery and serves as an important starting point for clinical studies.

Circulating, cell-free mitochondrial DNA (ccf-mtDNA) and nuclear DNA (ccf-nDNA) are under investigation as biomarkers for various diseases. Optimal ccf-mtDNA isolation parameters, like those outlined for ccf-nDNA, have not been established. Here, we optimized a protocol for both ccf-mtDNA and ccf-nDNA recovery using a magnetic bead-based isolation process on an automated 96-well platform. Using the optimized protocol, our data show 6-fold improved yields of ccf-mtDNA when compared to the starting protocol. Digestion conditions, liquid handling characteristics, and magnetic particle processor programming all contributed to increased recovery and improved reproducibility. To our knowledge, this is the first high-throughput approach optimized for mtDNA and nDNA recovery and serves as an important starting point for clinical studies.Graphical Abstract

Despite the increasing reliance on polymyxin antibiotics (polymyxin B and colistin) for treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections, many clinical laboratories are unable to perform susceptibility testing due to the lack of accurate and reliable methods. Although gradient agar diffusion is commonly performed for other antimicrobials, its use for polymyxins is discouraged due to poor performance characteristics. Performing gradient agar diffusion with calcium enhancement of susceptibility testing media has been shown to improve the identification of polymyxin-resistant isolates with plasmid-mediated resistance (mcr-1). We therefore sought to evaluate the broad clinical applicability of this approach for colistin susceptibility testing by assessing a large and diverse collection of resistant and susceptible patient isolates collected from multiple U.S. medical centers. Among 217 isolates, the overall categorical and essential agreement for calcium-enhanced gradient agar diffusion were 73.7% and 65.5%, respectively, compared to the results for reference broth microdilution. Performance varied significantly by organism group, with agreement being highest for Enterobacterales and lowest for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nevertheless, even for Enterobacterales, there was a high rate of very major errors (9.2%). Performance was similarly poor for calcium-enhanced broth microdilution. While calcium enhancement did allow for more accurate categorization of mcr-1-resistant isolates, there were unacceptably high rates of errors for both susceptible and non-mcr-1-resistant isolates, raising serious doubts about the suitability of these calcium-enhanced methods for routine colistin susceptibility testing in clinical laboratories.