BackgroundThe prevalence of Achromobacter xylosoxidans lung isolation in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients has increased, but the impact on lung function is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of A. xylosoxidans isolation on respiratory function of adult patients with CF in the first 3 years after identification of A. xylosoxidans isolation.MethodsThis was a case–control retrospective study performed at a single CF centre in Lille, France. Data for 36 patients with CF who had at least one sputum culture positive for A. xylosoxidans (Ax+) were evaluated and compared with control CF patients uninfected by A. xylosoxidans (Ax−). Respiratory function and exacerbation frequency were evaluated between 1 year prior to and 3 years after A. xylosoxidans isolation.ResultsCompared with the Ax− group, the Ax+ group had a lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at baseline (median (interquartile range): 55.2% (50.6–59.8%) versus 73.8% (67.2–80.4%); p=0.005), a greater decline in FEV1 (±se) in the first year after A. xylosoxidans identification (−153.6±16.1 mL·year−1 versus −63.8±18.5 mL·year−1; p=0.0003), and more exacerbations in the first 3 years after A. xylosoxidans identification (9 (7–12) versus 7 (5–10); p=0.03). Ax+ patients co-colonised with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=27, 75%) had a greater FEV1 decline (p=0.003) and more exacerbations in the year after A. xylosoxidans identification (p=0.037) compared with patients colonised with A. xylosoxidans alone. Patients with chronic A. xylosoxidans isolation (n=23, 64%) had more exacerbations than intermittently colonised patients in the 3 years after A. xylosoxidans identification (p=0.012).ConclusionA. xylosoxidans isolation is associated with a decline in respiratory function in patients with CF. Chronic A. xylosoxidans isolation and P. aeruginosa co-isolation may be markers of more severe respiratory disease in Ax+ patients.

Objective To assess the effectiveness of corticosteroids on outcomes of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring oxygen without mechanical ventilation. Methods We used routine care data from 51 hospitals in France and Luxembourg to assess the effectiveness of corticosteroids at 0.8 mg/kg/day eq. prednisone (CTC group) versus standard of care (no-CTC group) among adults 18 to 80 years old with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia requiring oxygen without mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome was intubation or death by day 28. In our main analysis, characteristics of patients at baseline (i.e., time when patients met all inclusion criteria) were balanced by using propensity-score inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results Among the 891 patients included in the analysis, 203 were assigned to the CTC group. Use of corticosteroids was not significantly associated with risk of intubation or death by day 28 (weighted hazard ratio [wHR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.39) or cumulative death rate (wHR 1.03, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.98). However, use of corticosteroids was associated with reduced risk of intubation or death by day 28 in the prespecified subgroups of patients requiring oxygen ≥ 3 L/min (wHR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.85) or C-reactive protein level ≥ 100 mg/L (wHR 0.44, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.85). Number of hyperglycaemia events was higher for patients with than without corticosteroids, but number of infections was similar. Conclusions We found no association between the use of corticosteroids and intubation or death in the broad population of patients 18 to 80 years old with COVID-19 hospitalized in non-intensive care unit settings. However, the treatment was associated with reduced risk of intubation or death for patients with ≥ 3 L/min oxygen or C-reactive protein level ≥ 100 mg/L at baseline. Further research need to confirm the right timing of corticosteroids for patients with COVID-19 requiring oxygen only.

Issues have been raised concerning clinical relevance of HIV-1 proviral DNA genotypic resistance test (DNA GRT). To assess impact of DNA GRT on choice of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and subsequent virological outcome, we retrospectively reviewed decision-making and viral load (VL) evolution following DNA GRT performed in our center between January 2012 and December 2017, except those prescribed within the framework of a clinical trial. A total of 304 DNA GRTs were included, 185 (62%) performed in a context of virological success. Only 34% of tests were followed by ART change, more frequently in situation of virological success (39% vs. 26%, p = 0.02). In this situation, ART change guided by DNA GRT led to VL >20 copies/mL after 6 months in 5% of cases. In multivariate analysis, higher HIV DNA quantification (p = 0.01) was associated with occurrence of viremia. A higher nadir of CD4 count (p = 0.04) and a longer time with VL <20 copies/mL (p = 0.04) were independently associated with a lower risk of viremia. In situation of low-level viremia, ART change guided by DNA GRT led to VL <20 copies/mL after 6 months in 52% of cases, while decision to maintain the same treatment led to VL <20 copies/mL in 74% of cases. In multivariate analysis, longer time with VL >20 copies/mL (p = 0.02) was associated with persistence of virological replication. In conclusion, in situation of virological success, use of DNA GRT in addition to analysis of historical RNA GRT to guide ART optimization appears safe. Its prescription framework in situation of low-level viremia deserves to be better defined.

No abstract

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.