Objectives: Cytokines are potential new serum markers, especially desirable for malignancies with poor prognosis like non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Cytokines, tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8, soluble TNF (sTNF) RI, sTNF RII, soluble IL-2 receptor-α, IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), IL-10, vascular endothelial growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and macrophage (M-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, as well as tumor markers – carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC) and CYFRA 21.1 – were assessed in the sera of 103 untreated NSCLC patients, and these cytokines and tumor markers were refered to clinical parameters of the disease and to the overall survival of patients evaluated during a 6-year follow-up. Results: Most of the factors analyzed were found to be elevated in the sera of NSCLC patients, and increases in IL-6, IL-8 and sTNF RI were noted in the greatest proportion of stage I patients. Most cytokine/cytokine receptor levels revealed higher sensitivity than the standard tumor markers; IL-6 and IL-1ra levels were significantly different in patients with squamous cell versus adenocarcinoma; IL-6 and IL-10 were related to the tumor size, while IL-6 and M-CSF levels significantly increased with disease progression. A significant prognostic value of pretreatment serum M-CSF and CEA levels in NSCLC patients has been shown, but only M-CSF proved to be an independent prognostic factor. Conclusions: Increased pretreatment serum M-CSF level is a significant independent predictor of poor survival in patients with NSCLC.
Abstract. Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are routinely used to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with common activating mutations of the EGFR gene. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacies of EGFR-TKIs in patients with common (exon 19 deletions and exon 21 p.Leu858Arg) and rare EGFR mutations. A retrospective analysis of 180 NSCLC patients with common (n=167) and rare (n=13) EGFR mutations treated with erlotinib (n=98), gefitinib (n=66) and afatinib (n=16) was performed. EGFR mutations were determined using RT-PCR and the EntroGen EGFR Mutations Analysis kit. Partial and complete response (PR and CR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Demographic and clinical factors had no impact on PFS or OS in patients treated with EGFR-TKIs. Erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib showed similar efficacies based on treatment response, median PFS, and OS. The type of EGFR mutation had no impact on median OS; however, median PFS was significantly longer in patients with the exon 19 deletion compared to patients with the exon 21 p.Leu858Arg substitution and rare EGFR gene mutations (P=0.013). Patients with common EGFR mutations showed significantly longer median PFS than those with rare EGFR mutations (10 vs. 5 months; P=0.009). Erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib show similar efficacies in NSCLC patients with both common and rare EGFR mutations. When undergoing EGFR-TKI treatment, patients with rare EGFR mutations showed similar OS but poorer PFS. Further investigation into the associations between particular rare EGFR mutations and EGFR-TKIs treatment outcomes is required.
Our data indicate that miR-9, miR-16, miR-205 and miR-486 may serve as NSCLC biomarkers. The observed cancer-related pre- and post-operative changes in their plasma levels may not only reflect the presence of a primary cancer, but also of a systemic response to cancer.
Beside prognostic factors already recognized as favorable in patients with BM, the adenocarcinoma histology and female sex were prevalent in long-term survivors of BM from lung cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.