Our data indicate that miR-9, miR-16, miR-205 and miR-486 may serve as NSCLC biomarkers. The observed cancer-related pre- and post-operative changes in their plasma levels may not only reflect the presence of a primary cancer, but also of a systemic response to cancer.

No abstract

No abstract

IntroductionEchocardiographic evaluation of regional myocardial function helps to assess the efficacy of therapeutic interventions and to predict the prognosis and clinical outcomes.AimTo assess whether myocardial strain can be useful in estimation of left ventricle (LV) function in patients who have undergone transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).Material and methodsTwenty-six patients with severe aortic stenosis, who successfully underwent TAVI, were enrolled in the study. Left ventricular peak systolic longitudinal strain (LV PSLS) was obtained before and 1 year after the procedure. Analysis included the potent influence of factors such as sex, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), type of prosthesis implanted or the type of the approach on LV PSLS values.ResultsWe observed a significant improvement in LV PSLS values after TAVI (–10.9 ±5.7 vs. –13.4 ±4.7, p < 0.05). Men had better improvement in LV PSLS after TAVI, but their starting values were considerably lower (M: –10.7 ±4.5 before vs. –13.3 ±4.9 after, p < 0.05; W: –11.8 ±6.8 before vs. –11.9 ±5.6 after, p = NS). Patients with starting LVEF ≤ 40% benefited from the procedure (LV PSLS: –10.3 ±6.4 before vs. –13.7 ±2.9 after, p < 0.05), but in the group of patients with the higher starting LVEF no significant changes in LV PSLS were observed. We also did not note any differences in LV PSLS depending on type of the prosthesis implemented (Edwards Sapiens/CoreValve). Patients in whom the prostheses were implemented via the femoral approach only presented significant increase in LV PSLS values (before: –10.4 ±6.7 vs. after: –13.6 ±3.7, p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe TAVI results in improvement of LV systolic function according to LV PSLS values. Some factors, especially lower baseline LVEF, are related to increased benefit in LV PSLS after TAVI.

IntroductionThe study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling and its impact on long-term prognosis in patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).AimTo assess the percentage of reverse remodeling and its prognostic factors in anterior STEMI patients.Material and methodsThis observational study included 40 patients with first ever STEMI of the anterior wall. LV reverse remodeling was defined as the reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume (ΔLVESV) by ≥ 10% in 3D transthoracic echocardiography (3D-TTE) at 3-month follow-up. 3D-TTE and speckle tracking imaging were performed during index hospitalization, while 3D-TTE and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) were performed at 3 months following the procedure. Patients were followed up for a median time of 3.4 years in order to evaluate major adverse cardiovascular events.ResultsLeft ventricular reverse remodeling at 3-month follow-up was confirmed in 15 (37.5%) patients. The presence of reverse remodeling was predicted by lower troponin levels (unit OR = 0.86, p = 0.02), lower sum of ST-segment elevations before (unit OR = 0.87, p = 0.03) and after PCI (unit OR = 0.40, p = 0.03), lower maximal ST-segment elevation after PCI (unit OR = 0.01, p = 0.03), lower wall motion score index (unit OR 0.40, p = 0.03) and more negative anterior wall global longitudinal strain (unit OR = 0.88, p = 0.045). Nine MACE were reported in the without reverse remodeling group only. Non-significantly better event-free survival in the reverse remodeling group was demonstrated (log-rank p = 0.07).ConclusionsDevelopment of reverse modeling in patients with optimal revascularization and tailored pharmacotherapy is relatively high. Further studies are warranted in order to adjudicate its prognostic role for the prediction of adverse events.