Loss of the tumor-suppressor gene SMAD4 promotes progression of high-grade Barrett's esophagus toward esophageal adenocarcinoma. This study provides an Q7 in vivo model of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus progression toward invasive esophageal adenocarcinoma upon SMAD4 inactivation.BACKGROUND & AIMS: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) develops from its precursor Barrett's esophagus through intermediate stages of low-and high-grade dysplasia. However, knowledge of genetic drivers and molecular mechanisms implicated in disease progression is limited. Herein, we investigated the effect of SMAD4 loss on transforming growth factor b (TGF-b) signaling functionality and in vivo tumorigenicity in high-grade dysplastic Barrett's cells.
METHODS:An in vivo xenograft model was used to test tumorigenicity of SMAD4 knockdown or knockout in CP-B highgrade dysplastic Barrett's cells. RT 2
Q8polymerase chain reaction arrays were used to analyze TGF-b signaling functionality, and low-coverage whole-genome sequencing was performed to detect copy number alterations upon SMAD4 loss.
RESULTS:We found that SMAD4 knockout significantly alters the TGF-b pathway target gene expression profile. SMAD4 knockout positively regulates potential oncogenes such as CRYAB, ACTA2, and CDC6, whereas the CDKN2A/B tumorsuppressor locus was regulated negatively. We verified that SMAD4 in combination with CDC6-CDKN2A/B or CRYAB genetic alterations in patient tumors have significant predictive value for poor prognosis. Importantly, we investigated the effect of SMAD4 inactivation in Barrett's tumorigenesis. We found that genetic knockdown or knockout of SMAD4 was sufficient to promote tumorigenesis in dysplastic Barrett's esophagus cells in vivo. Progression to invasive EAC was accompanied by distinctive and consistent copy number alterations in SMAD4 knockdown or knockout xenografts.CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, up-regulation of oncogenes, downregulation of tumor-suppressor genes, and chromosomal instability within the tumors after SMAD4 loss implicates SMAD4 as a protector of genome integrity in EAC development and progression. Foremost, SMAD4 loss promotes tumorigenesis from dysplastic Barrett's toward EAC.
Hormone receptor expression is a characteristic of low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC). Studies investigating estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression levels suggest its prognostic and predictive significance, although their associations with key molecular aberrations are not well understood. As such, we sought to describe the specific genomic profiles associated with different ER/PR expression patterns and survival outcomes in a cohort of patients with advanced disease. The study comprised fifty-five advanced-staged (III/IV) LGSOCs from the Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource (COEUR) for which targeted mutation sequencing, copy-number aberration, clinical and follow-up data were available. ER, PR, and p16 expression were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Tumors were divided into low and high ER/PR expression groups based on Allred scoring. Copy number analysis revealed that PR-low tumors (Allred score <2) had a higher fraction of the genome altered by copy number changes compared to PR-high tumors (p = 0.001), with cancer genes affected within specific loci linked to altered peptidyl-tyrosine kinase, MAP-kinase, and PI3-kinase signaling. Cox regression analysis showed that ER-high (p = 0.02), PR-high (p = 0.03), stage III disease (p = 0.02), low residual disease burden (p = 0.01) and normal p16 expression (p<0.001) were all significantly associated with improved overall survival. This study provides evidence that genomic aberrations are linked to ER/PR expression in primary LGSOC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.