Posttraumatic arthrofibrosis is a common problem encountered in the orthopaedic setting for which there is no agreement on the optimal management strategy. The literature does not optimally describe the efficacy of arthroscopic lysis of adhesions for arthrofibrosis following tibial plateau fracture. The purpose of this study is to quantify the efficacy of arthroscopic lysis of adhesions with manipulation for the treatment of arthrofibrosis of the knee in patients who previously underwent surgical management of tibial plateau fracture. All patients who underwent arthroscopic lysis of adhesions from a single surgeon since 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by flexion, extension, and range of motion (ROM) preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively at intervals of 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, and any additional long-term follow-up. A total of 28 patients who had developed arthrofibrosis following surgical management of a tibial plateau fracture and failed nonsurgical management of knee stiffness were included in this study. There were significant improvements in total ROM following intervention at all time points compared with preoperative values (p < 0.001), with mean improvements of 59.3 degrees intraoperatively, 32.9 degrees (1 week), 37.1 degrees (4 weeks), 41.5 degrees (8 weeks), and 47.6 degrees (12 weeks). There were significant improvements in degrees of knee flexion following intervention at all time points compared with preoperative values (p < 0.001), with mean improvements of 50.8 degrees intraoperatively, 27.3 degrees (1 week), 36.0 degrees (4 weeks), 38.3 degrees (8 weeks), and 43.9 degrees (12 weeks). There were significant increases in degrees of knee extension intraoperatively (8.5 degrees) and at 1 week postoperatively (5.9 degrees) compared with preoperative values (p <0.01). At 12 weeks postoperatively, those who had previously undergone external fixation had significantly greater increases in ROM (p = 0.048). Arthroscopic lysis of adhesions for knee arthrofibrosis following surgical management of tibial plateau fracture significantly improves knee ROM.

Background: The Internet is often the first resource used by applicants to evaluate fellowship programs. However, information on these websites can be often incomplete, inaccessible, and/or inaccurate. The primary objective of this study was to examine key factors that orthopedic foot and ankle fellowship applicants use to rank programs. The secondary objective was to assess both the accessibility and availability of the information on orthopedic foot and ankle fellowship program websites. Methods: A Qualtrics survey was distributed via e-mail to those who matched into an orthopedic foot and ankle fellowship position from years 2008-2020. A comprehensive list of orthopedic foot and ankle fellowship programs was created. Program websites were evaluated for accessibility as well as the quality of recruitment and educational content. Results: There were a total of 114 survey responses out of 644 invites (17.7%). The most important factors for establishing a rank list were operative experience, current faculty, and program reputation. Eighty-five percent (41/48) of orthopedic foot and ankle fellowship websites were directly accessible using Google. On average, accessible orthopedic foot and ankle fellowship websites contained only 57% (11.5/20) of the content deemed desirable. Conclusion: Orthopedic foot and ankle websites are widely accessible and have higher recruitment and educational quality content scores compared with previously published data. The most important factors for establishing a rank list are consistent with previous literature. Those who ranked operative experience as one of the most important factors when establishing a rank list did not complete more operative cases than those who did not. Level of Evidence: Level IV.