BackgroundDrug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum poses a major threat to malaria control. Combination antimalarial therapy including artemisinins has been advocated recently to improve efficacy and limit the spread of resistance, but artemisinins are expensive and relatively untested in highly endemic areas. We compared artemisinin-based and other combination therapies in four districts in Uganda with varying transmission intensity.Methods and FindingsWe enrolled 2,160 patients aged 6 mo or greater with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Patients were randomized to receive chloroquine (CQ) + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP); amodiaquine (AQ) + SP; or AQ + artesunate (AS). Primary endpoints were the 28-d risks of parasitological failure either unadjusted or adjusted by genotyping to distinguish recrudescence from new infections.A total of 2,081 patients completed follow-up, of which 1,749 (84%) were under the age of 5 y. The risk of recrudescence after treatment with CQ + SP was high, ranging from 22% to 46% at the four sites. This risk was significantly lower (p < 0.01) after AQ + SP or AQ + AS (7%–18% and 4%–12%, respectively). Compared to AQ + SP, AQ + AS was associated with a lower risk of recrudescence but a higher risk of new infection. The overall risk of repeat therapy due to any recurrent infection (recrudescence or new infection) was similar at two sites and significantly higher for AQ + AS at the two highest transmission sites (risk differences = 15% and 16%, p< 0.003).ConclusionAQ + AS was the most efficacious regimen for preventing recrudescence, but this benefit was outweighed by an increased risk of new infection. Considering all recurrent infections, the efficacy of AQ + SP was at least as efficacious at all sites and superior to AQ + AS at the highest transmission sites. The high endemicity of malaria in Africa may impact on the efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapy.The registration number for this trial is ISRCTN67520427 (http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn/trial/|/0/67520427.html).

The manufacturer's definition of QFT conversion results in an inflated conversion rate that is incompatible with our low-risk setting. A significantly higher QFT cutoff value is needed to match the historical TST conversion rate. Nonreproducible conversions in most converters suggested false-positive results.

Rationale: Interferon gamma (IFN-g) release assays for latent tuberculosis infection result in a larger-than-expected number of conversions and reversions in occupational screening programs, and reproducibility of test results is a concern.Objectives: Knowledge of the relative contribution and extent of the individual sources of variability (immunological, preanalytical, or analytical) could help optimize testing protocols. Methods:We performed a systematic review of studies published by October 2013 on all potential sources of variability of commercial IFN-g release assays (QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T-SPOT.TB). The included studies assessed test variability under identical conditions and under different conditions (the latter both overall and stratified by individual sources of variability). Linear mixed effects models were used to estimate withinsubject SD. Measurements and Main Results:We identified a total of 26 articles, including 7 studies analyzing variability under the same conditions, 10 studies analyzing variability with repeat testing over time under different conditions, and 19 studies reporting individual sources of variability. Most data were on QuantiFERON (only three studies on T-SPOT.TB). A considerable number of conversions and reversions were seen around the manufacturer-recommended cut-point. The estimated range of variability of IFN-g response in QuantiFERON under identical conditions was 60.47 IU/ml (coefficient of variation, 13%) and 60.26 IU/ml (30%) for individuals with an initial IFN-g response in the borderline range (0.25-0.80 IU/ml). The estimated range of variability in noncontrolled settings was substantially larger (61.4 IU/ml; 60%). Blood volume inoculated into QuantiFERON tubes and preanalytic delay were identified as key sources of variability.Conclusions: This systematic review shows substantial variability with repeat IFN-g release assays testing even under identical conditions, suggesting that reversions and conversions around the existing cut-point should be interpreted with caution.

Background Improved control efforts are reducing the burden of malaria in Africa, but may result in decreased antimalarial immunity. Methods A cohort of 129 children aged 1–10 years in Kampala, Uganda were treated with amodiaquine+sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for 396 episodes of uncomplicated malaria over a 29 month period as part of a longitudinal clinical trial. Results The risk of treatment failure increased over the course of the study from 5% to 21% (HR=2.4/yr, 95%CI=1.3–4.3). Parasite genetic polymorphisms were associated with an increased risk of failure, but their prevalence did not change over time. Three markers of antimalarial immunity were associated with a decreased risk of treatment failure: increased age (HR=0.5/5yrs, 95%CI=0.2–1.2), living in an area of higher malaria incidence (HR=0.26, 95%CI=0.11–0.64), and recent asymptomatic parasitemia (HR=0.06, 95%CI=0.01–0.36). In multivariate analysis, adjustment for recent asymptomatic parasitemia, but not parasite polymorphisms, removed the association between calendar time and the risk of treatment failure (HR=1.5/yr, 95%CI=0.7–3.4), suggesting that worsening treatment efficacy was best explained by decreasing host immunity. Conclusion Declining immunity in our study population appeared to be the primary factor underlying decreased efficacy of amodiaquine+sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. With improved malaria control efforts, decreasing immunity may unmask resistance to partially efficacious drugs.