No abstract

Vehicle emissions are a major source of pollution in urban communities and idling may contribute up to 34% or more to local air pollution levels. Reduced idling has been found to be an effective policy tool for improving air quality, especially around schools, where it may also improve outcomes for asthmatic children. We studied two anti-idling campaigns in Salt Lake County, Utah to understand if reduced engine idling leads to behavioral change and subsequent reduction in traffic-related air pollution exposure of the related school. We found a 38% decrease in idling time following an anti-idling campaign and an 11% decrease in the number of vehicles idling at the school drop-off zones. The air quality measurements showed improvement in the middle of the campaign, but seasonal variability as well as atmospheric inversion events had substantial effects on overall ambient pollutant concentrations. This study provides an encouraging starting point to develop more effective anti-idling campaigns to protect the health of children, school staff, and the surrounding community.

Air pollution near schools is particularly problematic. Pollution emissions from vehicle idling at or around schools may have significant effects on children’s health including increased rates of asthma and childhood leukemia. Outdoor pollution emissions from idling vehicles can also infiltrate into the schools resulting in health hazards both in school drop-off zones as well as inside nearby buildings. An Idle-Free Campaign was enacted at an elementary school to reduce idling among parents dropping off and picking up students. The campaign involved a focus group, surveys, informational events and materials, and vehicle counting efforts before and after the campaign. The surveys found that regardless of gender or level of education, parents were very concerned about air pollution concerns associated with idling and were willing to take steps to reduce their children’s exposure. Furthermore, the vehicle counting efforts showed a 17% reduction in idling vehicles and a 37% reduction in idling time following the anti-idling campaign. These findings show that a multi-pronged approach involving parents, teachers, staff, bus drivers, and delivery truck drivers, may be an effective tool to reduce idling at schools thus reducing children’s exposure.