No abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as an alternative tool for diagnosing schistosomiasis in individuals with low-level parasite burden from areas of low endemicity or under occasional risk of infection by Schistosoma mansoni. A total of 102 samples were tested in this study using 2 PCR assays utilizing distinct primer pairs. One of the primer pairs was targeted to a highly repeated 121-base pair sequence of S. mansoni, and the other was targeted to Schistosoma 28S rDNA. The samples were divided into 4 groups according to parasite burden of the individual as follows: 16 individuals with schistosomiasis excreting less than 10 eggs per gram of feces (EPG), 18 individuals excreting higher than 10 EPG, 22 individuals with reactive IgG-ELISA against S. mansoni soluble membrane antigen and negative coproscopy, and 46 controls samples including 25 individuals with other intestinal parasites and 21 individuals with negative parasitologic examination. The results obtained with stool samples from individuals with schistosomiasis showed a high sensitivity for PCR as S. mansoni DNA was detected in 91% (31/34) of the samples analyzed. No amplification was observed in 3 stool samples from individuals excreting below 10 EPG. The specificity of the test for both pairs of primers was 100%. In the group of seropositive individuals, S. mansoni DNA was detected in 59% (13/22) of fecal samples, corroborating the serologic results. Overall, PCR can be an important tool for detecting S. mansoni infection in individuals excreting few eggs in feces. Moreover, the determination of the infection through the detection of S. mansoni DNA in stool samples from seropositive individuals represents a new means of confirming the results of IgG-ELISA for schistosomiasis. Therefore, studies in this direction should be encouraged and extended.

No abstract

Small mammals are found naturally infected by Schistosoma mansoni, becoming a confounding factor for control programs of schistosomiasis in endemic areas. The aims of this study were: to investigate the infection rates by S. mansoni on the water-rat Nectomys squamipes during four years in endemic areas of Sumidouro, state of Rio de Janeiro, using mark-recapture technique; to compare two diagnostic methods for schistosomiasis; and to evaluate the effects of the chemotherapy in the human infected population on the rodent infection rates. The rodent infection rates of S. mansoni increased when rodent population sizes were lower. Coprology and serology results presented the same trends along time and were correlated. Serology could detect recent infection, including the false negatives in the coprology. The chemotherapy in the humans could not interrupt the rodent infection. Rodents can increase the schistosomiaisis transmission where it already exists, they probably maintain the transmission cycle in the nature and can be considered as biological indicators of the transmission sites of this parasite since they are highly susceptible to infection. The water-rats may present different levels of importance in the transmission dynamics of S. mansoni infection cycle for each area, and can be considered important wild-reservoirs of this human disease.Key words: diagnostic methods -population ecology -rodents -schistosomiasis Small mammals are found naturally infected by Schistosoma mansoni, becoming a confounding factor for control programs of schistosomiasis in endemic areas (Barbosa et al. 1958, Antunes et al. 1971, Rey 1993. Among the extra-human definitive hosts of this parasite, rodents of the genera Nectomys and Holochilus are the most probable wild reservoirs taking into account: (1) their semiaquatic habits (Ernest & Mares 1986), which make them highly exposed to infection; (2) their wide geographic distribution (Bonvicino 1994) coincident with the distribution of schistosomiasis in Brazil; (3) presence of infected individuals in most of the endemic areas where they were investigated, despite of the low human prevalence -rodents frequently showing higher infection rates in relation to human populations (Rey 1993); (4) rodent tolerance to human presence, occurring near human dwellings. Several experimental studies also support the hypothesis that water-rats are probable wild reservoirs of S. mansoni, showing high susceptibility to infection (Borda 1972, Souza et al. 1992, Maldonado Jr. et al. 1994, Ribeiro et al. 1998, somatic development hypertrophy of adult worms , elimination of viable eggs with high infectivity potential (Picot 1992), high infection persistence , low pathogenicity with efficient peri-ovular modulation and low tissue aggression (Silva & Andrade 1989), and ability to close the transmission cycle in semi-natural conditions (Antunes et al. 1973, Carvalho et al. 1976, Kawazoe & Pinto 1983. Infection of small mammals other than Nectomys and Holochilus by S. mansoni occurs only occasionally, especial...

Amebiasis is an infection caused by Entamoeba histolytica. However, differentiation between E. histolytica and Entamoeba dispar, which are morphologically identical species, is essential for treatment decision, precaution of the invasive disease and public health. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate a Multiplex -PCR for detection and differentiation of E. histolytica from E. dispar from fresh stool samples in comparison with the coproantigen commercial ELISA. Microscopic examination of stools using the Coprotest method, detection of stool antigen by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit and a home made Multiplex-PCR, were used for the diagnosis of amoebiasis infection. Analysis of the 127 stools samples by microscopy examination demonstrated that only 27 (21%) samples were positive for E. histolytica/E. dispar complex. Among these stool samples, 11 were positive by Multiplex-PCR, with nine presenting the diagnostic fragment characteristic of E. dispar (96 bp) and two presenting diagnostic fragment of E. histolytica (132 bp). Among negative samples detected by microscopic examination, three positive samples for E. dispar and one positive for E. histolytica by Multiplex-PCR was observed. This denotes a low sensibility of microscopic examination when a single stool sample is analyzed. Assay for detection of E. histolytica antigen was concordant with multiplex-PCR in relation to E. histolytica. Statistical analysis comparing the sensibility tests was not done because of the low number of E. histolytica cases. The results demonstrate the importance of the specific techniques use for the differentiation between E. histolytica and E. dispar.