Summary
Background
Gastrointestinal angiodysplasias (GIADs) may be the cause of recurrent bleeding, despite endoscopic treatment.
Aim
To evaluate the effect of long‐acting somatostatin analogues on blood transfusion requirements, in patients with refractory bleeding due to GIADs.
Methods
Consecutive patients with recurrent bleeding from GIADs were enrolled. They received somatostatin analogue treatment for at least 6 months. The efficacy was evaluated in terms of blood transfusions, frequency of bleeding episodes and haemoglobin level during 6 months of treatment (Period During) compared to a 6‐months' period before treatment (Period Before).
Results
Fifteen patients were enrolled from 2007 to 2010. The median duration of somatostatin analogue treatment was 12 months (range: 6–36). The number of transfusions significantly decreased in Period During compared with Period Before [median number: 2 (0–14) vs. 10 (6–24); P < 0.001]. The percentage of patients who experienced a bleeding event was lower during somatostatin analogues treatment (20% vs. 73%; P = 0.01). The mean haemoglobin level was significantly higher when somatostatin analogues were offered [median: 10 g/dL (9–13) vs. 7 (5–8.5); P < 0.001]. None of the patients discontinued treatment due to side effects.
Conclusions
Long‐acting somatostatin analogues treatment decreased transfusion needs in patients with refractory bleeding from gastrointestinal angiodysplasias. Bleeding episodes were limited and haemoglobin improved during treatment. Long‐acting somatostatin analogues may represent an option for the management of patients with chronic bleeding due to gastrointestinal angiodysplasias.
Background:Gastrointestinal angiodysplasias (GIADs) could be responsible for recurrent bleeding and severe anemia. Somatostatin analogs could reduce transfusion requirements in these patients but no randomized controlled study is available. The main objective of the ANGIOPAS phase II double-blinded randomized, noncomparative study was to assess the effectiveness of pasireotide-LAR in reducing transfusion requirements in patients with refractory GIADs bleeding.Methods:A total of 22 patients with transfusion requirements ⩾6 units of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) during the 6 months prior to inclusion were randomized to receive pasireotide-LAR 60 mg (n = 10) or placebo (n = 12) every 28 days for 6 months. Patients were then followed for an additional 6 months after stopping treatment.Results:The pasireotide-LAR and placebo groups were equivalent for age, sex, comorbidities and transfusion requirement during the reference period (median 13 and 9.5 pRBCs). A 50 and 83% success rate (success defined as a decrease of at least 30% of transfused pRBCs) was observed in the pasireotide-LAR arm in the Intent to Treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis respectively. The need for transfusion during the intervention period was 3 pRBC units in the pasireotide-LAR group (range 0–26) and 11.5 pRBC units in the placebo group (range 0–23). Overall, three cases with glycemic control impairment were observed in the pasireotide-LAR group including one de novo diabetes.Conclusion:This double-blinded noncomparative randomized phase II study suggests, for the first time, the effectiveness of pasireotide-LAR 60 mg every 28 days to decrease the transfusion requirement in patients with recurrent bleeding due to GIADs.
Background and study aims: Routine biopsy of the upper gastrointestinal tract is performed with increasing frequency. It is generally considered to be safe without significant complication. However, gastrointestinal bleeding as a result of cold biopsy is a known complication. We report seven cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding after cold biopsy and discuss clinical data, risks factors, severity and management of this event. We suggest that physicians must be more cautious with this rare but potentially severe complication.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.