The 1-year spontaneous mortality rate in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) approaches 70%. No prospective assessment of indications and impact on survival of current therapeutic procedures has been performed. We evaluated a therapeutic strategy uniformly applied during the last 8 years in a single referral center. Fifty-one consecutive patients first received anticoagulation and were treated for associated diseases. Symptomatic patients were considered for hepatic vein recanalization; then for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and finally for liver transplantation. The absence of a complete response led to the next procedure. Assessment was according to the strategy, whether procedures were technically applicable and successful. At entry, median (range) Child-Pugh score and Clichy prognostic index were 8 (5-12), and 5.4 (3.1-7.7), respectively. A complete response was achieved on medical therapy alone in 9 patients; after recanalization in 6, TIPS in 20, liver transplantation in 9, and retransplantation in 1. Of the 41 patients considered for recanalization, the procedure was not feasible in 27 and technically unsuccessful in 3. Of the 34 patients considered for TIPS, the procedure was considered not feasible in 9 and technically unsuccessful in 4. At 1 year of follow-up, a complete response to TIPS was achieved in 84%. One-and 5-year survival from starting anticoagulation were 96% (95% CI, 90-100) and 89% (95% CI, 79-100), respectively. In conclusion, excellent survival can be achieved in BCS patients when therapeutic procedures are introduced by order of increasing invasiveness, based on the response to previous therapy rather than on the severity of the patient's condition. (HEPATOLOGY 2006;44:1308-1316
ObjectiveThe efficacy of anti-tumour necrosis factors (anti-TNFs) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and symptomatic small bowel stricture (SSBS) is controversial. The aim of this study was to estimate the efficacy of adalimumab in these patients and to identify the factors predicting success.DesignWe performed a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study in patients with CD and SSBS. The included patients underwent magnetic resonance enterography at baseline and subsequently received adalimumab. The primary endpoint was success at week 24, defined as adalimumab continuation without prohibited treatment (corticosteroids after the eight week following inclusion, other anti-TNFs), endoscopic dilation or bowel resection. The baseline factors independently associated with success were identified using a logistic regression model, leading to a simple prognostic score. Secondary endpoints were prolonged success after week 24 (still on adalimumab, without dilation nor surgery) and time to bowel resection in the whole cohort.ResultsFrom January 2010 to December 2011, 105 patients were screened and 97 were included. At week 24, 62/97 (64%) patients had achieved success. The prognostic score defined a good prognosis group with 43/49 successes, an intermediate prognosis group with 17/28 successes and a poor prognosis group with 1/16 successes. After a median follow-up time of 3.8 years, 45.7%±6.6% (proportion±SE) of patients who were in success at week 24 (ie, 29% of the whole cohort) were still in prolonged success at 4 years. Among the whole cohort, 50.7%±5.3% of patients did not undergo bowel resection 4 years after inclusion.ConclusionsA successful response to adalimumab was observed in about two-thirds of CD patients with SSBS and was prolonged in nearly half of them till the end of follow-up. More than half of the patients were free of surgery 4 years after treatment initiation.Clinical Trial registration numberNCT01183403; Results.
Our study identified MRI findings significantly associated with surgical pathological inflammation. These lesions are considered potentially reversible and may be efficiently treated medically. We also showed that fibrosis was closely and positively related to inflammation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.