ErbB2 is a receptor tyrosine kinase whose activity in normal cells depends on dimerization with another ligand-binding ErbB receptor. In contrast, amplification of c-erbB2 in tumors results in dramatic overexpression and constitutive activation of the receptor. Breast cancer cells overexpressing ErbB2 depend on its activity for proliferation, because treatment of these cells with ErbB2-specific antagonistic antibodies or kinase inhibitors blocks tumor cells in the G 1 phase of the cell cycle. Intriguingly, loss of ErbB2 signaling is accompanied by a decrease in the phosphotyrosine content of ErbB3. On the basis of these results, it has been proposed that ErbB3 might be a partner for ErbB2 in promoting cellular transformation. To test this hypothesis and directly examine the role of the ''kinase dead'' ErbB3, we specifically ablated its expression with a designer transcription factor (E3). By infection of ErbB2-overexpressing breast cancer cells with a retrovirus expressing E3, we show that ErbB3 is an essential partner in the transformation process. Loss of functional ErbB2 or ErbB3 has similar effects on cell proliferation and cell cycle regulators. Furthermore, expression of constitutively active protein kinase B rescues the proliferative block induced as a consequence of loss of ErbB2 or ErbB3 signaling. These results demonstrate that ErbB2 overexpression and activity alone are insufficient to promote breast tumor cell division. Furthermore, we identify ErbB3's role, which is to couple active ErbB2 to the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase͞protein kinase B pathway. Thus, the ErbB2͞ErbB3 dimer functions as an oncogenic unit to drive breast tumor cell proliferation.T he family of ErbB receptor tyrosine kinases includes four members: epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor͞ErbB1, ErbB2, ErbB3, and ErbB4. Binding of peptides of the EGFrelated growth factor family to the extracellular domain of ErbB receptors results in the formation of homo-and heterodimers. Ligand binding induces the intrinsic receptor kinase activity, ultimately leading to stimulation of intracellular signaling cascades (1, 2). The physiological role of ErbB2, in the context of ErbB ligand signaling, is to serve as a coreceptor (3, 4). In fact, ErbB2 appears to be the preferred partner of the other ligandbound ErbBs (5, 6). The importance of heterodimer-mediated signaling in normal development is obvious from studies in genetically modified mice. This is particularly true for ErbB2͞ ErbB3 and ErbB2͞ErbB4 heterodimers. Loss of ErbB2 or ErbB3 has a similar impact on neuronal development (7), whereas loss of ErbB2 or ErbB4 has major effects on heart development (8, 9).A wealth of clinical data has demonstrated that ErbB receptor tyrosine kinases, in particular ErbB1 and ErbB2, have roles in human cancer development, thus making them attractive targets for cancer therapies (10-13). ErbB2 overexpression, generally attributable to gene amplification, occurs in 25-30% of breast cancer and correlates with shorter time to relapse and lower overall survival (1...

The regulation of plasminogen activation involves genes for two plasminogen activators (tissue type and urokinase type), two specific inhibitors (type 1 and type 2), and a membrane-anchored urokinase-type plasminogen-activator-specific receptor. This system plays an important role in various biological processes involving extracellular proteolysis. Recent studies have revealed that the system, through interplay with integrins and the extracellular matrix protein vitronectin, is also involved in the regulation of cell migration and proliferation in a manner independent of proteolytic activity. The genes are expressed in many different cell types and their expression is under the control of diverse extracellular signals. Gene expression reflects the levels of the corresponding mRNA, which should be the net result of synthesis and degradation. Thus, modulation of mRNA stability is an important factor in overall regulation. This review summarizes current understanding of the biology and regulation of genes involved in plasminogen activation at different levels.

Overexpression of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinases has been found in many human breast cancers and has been associated with poor patient prognosis. In order to understand the mechanism by which FGFR mediates breast cancer cell proliferation, we used a low molecular weight compound, PD173074, that selectively inhibits FGFR tyrosine kinase activity and autophosphorylation. This potential anticancer agent caused a G1 growth arrest of MDA-MB-415, MDA-MB-453 and SUM 52 breast cancer cells. Our analyses revealed that FGFR signaling links to the cell cycle machinery via D-type cyclins. PD173074-mediated inhibition of FGFR activity caused downregulation of cyclin D1 and cyclin D2 expression, inhibition of cyclin D/cdk4 activity and, as a consequence, reduction of pRB phosphorylation. Retroviral-mediated ectopic expression of cyclin D1 prevented pRB hypophosphorylation and the cell cycle G1 block in PD173074-treated cells, suggesting a central role for D cyclins in proliferation of FGFR-driven breast cancer cells. The repression of FGFR activity caused downregulation of MAPK in MDA-MB-415 and MDA-MB-453 cells. In SUM 52 cells, both MAPK and PI3K signaling pathways were suppressed. In conclusion, results shown here describe a mechanism by which FGFR promotes proliferation of breast cancer cells.

Alterations in ErbB2 or fibroblast growth factor receptor-4 (FGFR-4) expression and activity occur in a significant fraction of breast cancers. Because signaling molecules and pathways cooperate to drive cancer progression, simultaneous targeting of multiple pathways is an appealing therapeutic strategy. With this in mind, we examined breast tumor cells for their sensitivity to the ErbB2 and FGFR inhibitors, PKI166 and PD173074, respectively. Simultaneous blocking of ErbB2 and FGFR-4 in MDA-MB-453 tumor cells had a stronger antiproliferative effect than treatment with individual inhibitors. Examination of cell cycle regulators revealed a novel translation-mediated mechanism whereby ErbB2 and FGFR-4 cooperate to regulate cyclin D1 levels. Our results showed that FGFR-4 and ErbB2 via the MAPK and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B pathways, respectively, both contribute to the maintenance of constitutive activity of the mammalian target of rapamycin translational pathway. Dual inhibition of these receptors strongly blocked S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) activity and cyclin D1 translation, as attested by a decrease in cyclin D1 mRNA association with polysomes. Ectopic expression of active protein kinase B or active S6K1 abrogated the dual inhibitor-mediated down-regulation of cyclin D1 expression, demonstrating the importance of these FGFR-4/ErbB2 signaling targets in regulating cyclin D1 translation. S6K1 has the central role in this process, since small interfering RNA-targeted S6K1 depletion led to a decrease in cellular S6K1 activity and, as a consequence, repression of cyclin D1 expression. Thus, we propose a novel mechanism for controlling cyclin D1 expression downstream of combined activity of ErbB2 and FGFR-4 that involves S6K1-mediated translation.

Expression of genes of the plasminogen activator (PA) system declines at the G 0 /G 1 -S-phase boundary of the cell cycle. We found that overexpression of E2F1-3, which acts mainly in late G 1 , inhibits promoter activity and endogenous expression of the urokinase-type PA (uPA) and PA inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) genes. This effect is dose dependent and conserved in evolution. Mutation analysis indicated that both the DNA-binding and transactivation domains of E2F1 are necessary for this regulation. Interestingly, an E2F1 mutant lacking the pRBbinding region strongly repressed the uPA and PAI-1 promoters. An E2F-mediated negative effect was also observed in pRB and p107/p130 knockout cell lines. This is the first report that E2F can act as a repressor independently of pocket proteins. Mutation of AP-1 elements in the uPA promoter abrogated E2F-mediated transcriptional inhibition, suggesting the involvement of AP-1 in this regulation. Results shown here identify E2F as an important component of transcriptional control of the PA system and thus provide new insights into mechanisms of cellular proliferation.Extracellular proteolysis, especially that mediated by the plasminogen activator (PA) system, plays an important role in various physiological and pathological processes, such as angiogenesis, wound healing, inflammation, and tumor metastasis (1, 27). PAs, urokinase-type PA (uPA) and tissue-type PA (tPA), are secreted serine proteases that convert the ubiquitous zymogen plasminogen to plasmin. This trypsin-like protease degrades a wide range of substrates, including various extracellular matrix proteins, such as fibronectin, vitronectin, and fibrin. Of the two PAs, uPA is considered to be engaged more in cell-associated proteolysis due to the presence of a cell surface-associated uPA receptor (uPAR). The activities of both uPA and tPA are negatively regulated by the binding of PA inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) and PAI-2, which are members of the serine protease inhibitor superfamily. Interestingly, both uPA and PAI-1 are highly expressed in various metastatic tumors, suggesting that controlled proteolysis is important for metastasis (1).The PA system may also have a significant role in cell cycle progression, where cells undergo detachment from neighboring cells and the extracellular matrix. It has been reported that PAI-1 and uPA mRNAs are rapidly induced soon after exposure of growth-arrested cells to serum-containing medium and that this expression declines prior to DNA synthesis in the G 1 -to-S transition phase (21,55,66). This pattern of expression appears also in the second cell cycle of synchronized cells, suggesting that the regulation is cell cycle dependent. Induction of the transcription of these genes in early-to-mid-G 1 phase is thought to be mediated through AP-1-and c-mycresponsive elements present in their promoters (33, 55). However, the suppression mechanism acting on the transcription of these genes in late G 1 has not been elucidated.One of the key regulators of cell cycle events at the boundary of the G 0 /G 1...