Susac's Syndrome (SS) is a rare, autoimmune angiopathy characterized by hearing loss, retinal artery occlusions and encephalopathy, which is usually expressed in multifocal neurological signs and symptoms, confusion state and cognitive impairment. There have been few descriptions of neuropsychological assessment of SS. We present a case study of 29-year-old woman who developed full SS. During the post-acute stage of disease, she was admitted to neurorehabilitation ward to improve her cognitive-behavioral and motor functioning. The initial assessment revealed attention, memory and executive dysfunctions, as well as behavioral changes including impulsivity, affective dysregulation and reduced self-awareness of disease deficits. After five weeks recovery process supported by rehabilitation program, improvement was observed, although some cognitive-behavioral deficits were still present in the follow-up assessment.

Background and aim Apathy is one of the neuropsychiatric symptoms of Wilson’s disease (WD) which typically affects the brain’s fronto-basal circuits. Lack of agreed diagnostic criteria and common use of self-description assessment tools lead to underestimation of this clinical phenomenon. The aim of this study was to investigate whether subjective and informant-based clinical features of apathy in patients with WD enable clinicians to make a valid diagnosis. Methods Multiple aspects of goal-oriented behavior were assessed in 30 patients with the neurological form of WD and 30 age-matched healthy participants using two questionnaires, the Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) and the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX). Both included a self-descriptive and a caregiver/proxy version. Cognitive functioning was estimated with the use of Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised. Results Patients obtained significantly worse scores on all clinical scales when more objective measures were considered. Features of apathy and executive dysfunction were revealed in patients’ caregiver versions of LARS and DEX, which may indicate poor self-awareness of patients with WD. Roughly 30% of participants were likely to present with clinically meaningful symptoms, independent of cognitive dysfunction. Conclusions Methods relying on self-description appear inferior to informant-based scales when diagnosing apathy. More objective criteria and measurement tools are needed to better understand this clinical syndrome.