The risk of pollen-induced allergies can be determined and predicted based on data derived from pollen monitoring. Hirst-type samplers are sensors that allow airborne pollen grains to be detected and their number to be determined. Airborne pollen grains are deposited on adhesive-coated tape, and slides are then prepared, which require further analysis by specialized personnel. Deep learning can be used to recognize pollen taxa based on microscopic images. This paper presents a method for recognizing a taxon based on microscopic images of pollen grains, allowing the pollen monitoring process to be automated. In this research, a deep CNN (convolutional neural network) model was built from scratch. Publicly available deep neural network models, pre-trained on image data (not including microscopic pictures), were also used. The results show that even a simple deep learning model produces quite good results when the classification of pollen grain taxa is performed directly from the images. The best deep learning model achieved 97.88% accuracy in the difficult task of recognizing three types of pollen grains (birch, alder, and hazel) with similar structures. The derived models can be used to build a system to support pollen monitoring experts in their work.

No abstract

Analysis of pollen material obtained from the Hirst-type apparatus, which is a tedious and labor-intensive process, is usually performed by hand under a microscope by specialists in palynology. This research evaluated the automatic analysis of pollen material performed based on digital microscopic photos. A deep neural network called YOLO was used to analyze microscopic images containing the reference grains of three taxa typical of Central and Eastern Europe. YOLO networks perform recognition and detection; hence, there is no need to segment the image before classification. The obtained results were compared to other deep learning object detection methods, i.e., Faster R-CNN and RetinaNet. YOLO outperformed the other methods, as it gave the mean average precision (mAP@.5:.95) between 86.8% and 92.4% for the test sets included in the study. Among the difficulties related to the correct classification of the research material, the following should be noted: significant similarities of the grains of the analyzed taxa, the possibility of their simultaneous occurrence in one image, and mutual overlapping of objects.