Background There is considerable burden of illness in hereditary angioedema (HAE). However, instruments to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in HAE are limited. The Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL) was developed to measure HRQoL in patients with recurrent angioedema; the validity of the AE-QoL in patients with HAE is described. Methods To identify disease-related experiences with a focus on the impact of HAE on HRQoL, interviews were conducted with a group of clinician experts and patients with HAE from Canada, France, Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States, along with a targeted literature review. Concepts were mapped to the AE-QoL to assess item relevance, interpretation, and conceptual coverage. Cognitive interviews assessed item clarity and relevance. A psychometric validation was performed using data from a phase 3 trial. Results Interviews were conducted with seven clinicians and 40 adult patients. Patients reported 35 unique impacts of HAE on their lives, the most frequent being on work/school, social relationships, physical activities, and emotions, particularly fear/worrying and anxiety. Saturation for these impacts was reached, and all concepts covered in the AE-QoL were reported during the interviews. Patients agreed that the questionnaire items and response options were clear and relevant, and the 4-week recall period was appropriate. The psychometric validation included data from 64 patients. For AE-QoL total scores, excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.90), test-retest reliability (intraclass coefficient > 0.80), convergent validity with the Sheehan Disability Scale (r = 0.663), divergent validity with the EQ-5D-5L index (r = 0.292) and EQ-VAS (r = 0.337), and known-groups validity (p < 0.0001; ɳ2 = 0.56) were demonstrated. Conclusions Qualitative and psychometric analyses showed that the AE-QoL is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring HRQoL in adult patients with HAE from six countries.

No abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Extremely premature (EP) infants (&lt;28 weeks gestational age) with respiratory conditions after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) impose a significant burden on caregivers. This study explored caregiver burden post-NICU discharge and perceptions of meaningful change in infant chronic respiratory morbidity. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Adult primary caregivers of EP infants 3–14 months corrected age were recruited through patient advocacy organizations or hospital centers in the USA, Northern Ireland, Germany, and Japan and interviewed by phone. Interviews explored caregiver experiences with infants with respiratory conditions, associated treatment burden, and meaningful change in infant respiratory morbidity as measured by treatment use. Qualitative analysis of interview data was performed using MAXQDA software. Sociodemographic data were summarized using descriptive statistics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Forty-five caregivers (95.6% female) of EP infants were interviewed. Respiratory morbidities post-NICU discharge included coughing (78%), breathing difficulties (76%), wheezing (58%), and bronchopulmonary dysplasia/chronic lung disease of prematurity (56%). Respiratory medications were required by 87% of infants, 80% used home respiratory technology support (e.g., supplemental oxygen), 38% were re-hospitalized, and 33% had emergency department visits. Caregivers considered visits to the emergency department to be the most burdensome treatment requirement they experienced, and reduction in the number of emergency department visits was considered the most meaningful change in treatment use. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> These findings underscore the significant burden faced by caregivers of EP infants with respiratory morbidities. Development of treatments for respiratory complications should take into consideration the concerns and preferences of caregivers in order to provide a meaningful benefit.